These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18054883)
1. Running an ethical trial 60 years after the Nuremberg Code. Markman JR; Markman M Lancet Oncol; 2007 Dec; 8(12):1139-1146. PubMed ID: 18054883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. Vollmann J; Winau R BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1445-9. PubMed ID: 8973233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Historical perspective and evolving concerns for human research. Lo B; Garan N Cancer Treat Res; 2007; 132():1-10. PubMed ID: 17305014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal. Katz J JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights. Shuster E Lancet; 1998 Mar; 351(9107):974-7. PubMed ID: 9734958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Right and Wrong of Making Experiments on Human Beings. JAMA; 2016 Dec; 316(24):2680. PubMed ID: 28027357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human experimentation in historical and ethical perspectives. Howard-Jones N Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(15):1429-48. PubMed ID: 6753169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical trials: vulnerability and ethical relativism]. Lima C Acta Med Port; 2005; 18(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 16207458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts. Annas GJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():17-45. PubMed ID: 11645690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Rice TW Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1325-9. PubMed ID: 18811995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code. Shuster E N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The case for evidence-based rulemaking in human subjects research. Sachs B Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):3-13. PubMed ID: 20526958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US medical researchers, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, and the Nuremberg Code. A review of findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Faden RR; Lederer SE; Moreno JD JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1667-71. PubMed ID: 8922454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of the Nuremberg physicians' trials--beginning a new era in the ethical judging of human experiments]. Kerpel-Fronius S Orv Hetil; 2008 Feb; 149(5):195-201. PubMed ID: 18218586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Going from principles to rules in research ethics. Sachs B Bioethics; 2011 Jan; 25(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 19659855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post-trial Access in Maternal Vaccine Trials. Van Roessel IMAA; Mazur NI; Shah SK; Bont L; Van Der Graaf R Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(S 02):S41-S47. PubMed ID: 31238358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Stateville penitentiary malaria experiments: a case study in retrospective ethical assessment. Miller FG Perspect Biol Med; 2013; 56(4):548-67. PubMed ID: 24769747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New European rules regarding the approval of clinical trials, the role of ethics committees and the protection of subjects. Nys H Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2012 Dec; 60(6):405-14. PubMed ID: 23064523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]