194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18054883)
1. Running an ethical trial 60 years after the Nuremberg Code.
Markman JR; Markman M
Lancet Oncol; 2007 Dec; 8(12):1139-1146. PubMed ID: 18054883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code.
Vollmann J; Winau R
BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1445-9. PubMed ID: 8973233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Historical perspective and evolving concerns for human research.
Lo B; Garan N
Cancer Treat Res; 2007; 132():1-10. PubMed ID: 17305014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.
Katz J
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights.
Shuster E
Lancet; 1998 Mar; 351(9107):974-7. PubMed ID: 9734958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Right and Wrong of Making Experiments on Human Beings.
JAMA; 2016 Dec; 316(24):2680. PubMed ID: 28027357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human experimentation in historical and ethical perspectives.
Howard-Jones N
Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(15):1429-48. PubMed ID: 6753169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical trials: vulnerability and ethical relativism].
Lima C
Acta Med Port; 2005; 18(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 16207458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.
Annas GJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():17-45. PubMed ID: 11645690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research.
Rice TW
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1325-9. PubMed ID: 18811995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.
Shuster E
N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The case for evidence-based rulemaking in human subjects research.
Sachs B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):3-13. PubMed ID: 20526958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US medical researchers, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, and the Nuremberg Code. A review of findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.
Faden RR; Lederer SE; Moreno JD
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1667-71. PubMed ID: 8922454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of the Nuremberg physicians' trials--beginning a new era in the ethical judging of human experiments].
Kerpel-Fronius S
Orv Hetil; 2008 Feb; 149(5):195-201. PubMed ID: 18218586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Going from principles to rules in research ethics.
Sachs B
Bioethics; 2011 Jan; 25(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 19659855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post-trial Access in Maternal Vaccine Trials.
Van Roessel IMAA; Mazur NI; Shah SK; Bont L; Van Der Graaf R
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(S 02):S41-S47. PubMed ID: 31238358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Stateville penitentiary malaria experiments: a case study in retrospective ethical assessment.
Miller FG
Perspect Biol Med; 2013; 56(4):548-67. PubMed ID: 24769747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New European rules regarding the approval of clinical trials, the role of ethics committees and the protection of subjects.
Nys H
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2012 Dec; 60(6):405-14. PubMed ID: 23064523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Declaration of Helsinki--nothing to declare?
Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9161):1285. PubMed ID: 10218519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
