226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18054922)
21. Discordant relationship between Essure microinsert position and tubal occlusion.
Hou MY
BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27466315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patients' satisfaction following laparoscopic cornuectomy for removal of hysteroscopic sterilization devices.
Eychenne C; Vidal F; Weyl A; Guerby P; Vaysse C; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Parant O; Siebert T
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 50(3):101939. PubMed ID: 33049363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Case report of failed tubal occlusion using Essure pbc (permanent birth control) hysteroscopic sterilisation procedure.
Karthigasu KA; Garry R; Hart R
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):365-7. PubMed ID: 16866803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Two Surgical Techniques for Essure Device Ablation: The Hysteroscopic Way and the Laparoscopic Way by Salpingectomy with Tubal Interstitial Resection.
Tissot M; Petry S; Lecointre L; Faller E; Baldauf JJ; Akladios C; Boisrame T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):603. PubMed ID: 30064007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Essure Surgical Removal and Subsequent Symptom Resolution: Case Series and Follow-Up Survey.
Brito LG; Cohen SL; Goggins ER; Wang KC; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):910-3. PubMed ID: 25843521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Essure microinsert imaging: does abnormal shape on ultrasound predict complications on HSG?
VanBuren WM; Suchet IB; Thiel JA; Karreman E
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2350-2358. PubMed ID: 27022912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Permanent tubal hysteroscopic sterilization].
Panel P; Jost S; Grosdemouge I; Friederich L; Niro J; Le Tohic A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012; 40(7-8):434-44. PubMed ID: 22658908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Essure transcervical tubal sterilization: a 5-year x-ray follow up.
Franchini M; Boeri C; Calzolari S; Imperatore A; Cianferoni L; Litta P; Giarrè G; Zerbetto I; Moncini I; Florio P
Fertil Steril; 2011 May; 95(6):2114-5. PubMed ID: 21392751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sonography, CT, and MRI appearance of the Essure microinsert permanent birth control device.
Wittmer MH; Brown DL; Hartman RP; Famuyide AO; Kawashima A; King BF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):959-64. PubMed ID: 16985143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Essure perforation and chronic pelvic pain.
Moawad N; Mansuria S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):285-6. PubMed ID: 21545955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of tubal patency after essure placement.
Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Vu TP; Kuo YF; Breitkopf D; Snyder RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23541247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pregnancy after Essure placement: report of two cases.
Moses AW; Burgis JT; Bacon JL; Risinger J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):724.e9-11. PubMed ID: 17543963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reproducibility of the interpretation of coronal 3D ultrasound view of the uterus to evaluate the position of Essure
Capmas P; Letendre I; Levaillant JM; Fuchs F; Panel P; Chambon G; Villefranque V; Levy-Zauberman Y; Fernandez H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):571-573. PubMed ID: 28676451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic Essure® Device Removal by En Bloc Salpingectomy-Cornuectomy with Intraoperative X-Ray Checking: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Miquel L; Crochet P; Francini S; Compan C; Boubli L; Agostini A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 31212073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization--5 years follow up of 1200 women.
Ríos-Castillo JE; Velasco E; Arjona-Berral JE; Monserrat Jordán JA; Povedano-Cañizares B; Castelo-Branco C
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Jun; 29(6):580-2. PubMed ID: 23557170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Incidence and risk factors for chronic pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization.
Yunker AC; Ritch JM; Robinson EF; Golish CT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 24952343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility of Essure placement in intrauterine device users.
Mascaro M; Mariño M; Vicens-Vidal M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 18602048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
