These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18055106)

  • 21. Impact of pH buffer capacity of sediment on dechlorination of atrazine using zero valent iron.
    Kim G; Jeong W; Choe S
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2007; 42(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 17454382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiolytic degradation of atrazine aqueous solution containing humic substances.
    Basfar AA; Mohamed KA; Al-Abduly AJ; Al-Shahrani AA
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Mar; 72(3):948-53. PubMed ID: 18597846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide.
    Coronell O; Mi B; Mariñas BJ; Cahill DG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selective removal of dissolved uranium in drinking water by nanofiltration.
    Favre-Réguillon A; Lebuzit G; Murat D; Foos J; Mansour C; Draye M
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):1160-6. PubMed ID: 17888486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lactic acid recovery from cheese whey fermentation broth using combined ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes.
    Li Y; Shahbazi A
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2006; 129-132():985-96. PubMed ID: 16915706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Removal of natural organic matter and THM formation potential by ultra- and nanofiltration of surface water.
    de la Rubia A; Rodríguez M; León VM; Prats D
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):714-22. PubMed ID: 17765283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Separate and concentrate lactic acid using combination of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Li Y; Shahbazi A; Williams K; Wan C
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 147(1-3):1-9. PubMed ID: 18401749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Removal of potassium chloride by nanofiltration from ion-exchanged solution containing potassium clavulanate.
    Kim HH; Kim JH; Chang YK
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Jan; 33(1):149-58. PubMed ID: 19649657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nanofiltration for trace organic contaminant removal: structure, solution, and membrane fouling effects on the rejection of perfluorochemicals.
    Steinle-Darling E; Reinhard M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jul; 42(14):5292-7. PubMed ID: 18754383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Leal AI; González M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of treatment efficiency of submerged nanofiltration membrane bioreactors using cellulose triacetate and polyamide membrane.
    Choi JH; Fukushi K; Yamamoto K
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):305-12. PubMed ID: 16003990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rapid treatment of water contamined with atrazine and parathion with zero-valent iron.
    Ghauch A; Rima J; Amine C; Martin-Bouyer M
    Chemosphere; 1999 Oct; 39(8):1309-15. PubMed ID: 10467726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts.
    Koyuncu I; Topacik D; Wiesner MR
    Water Res; 2004 Jan; 38(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 14675655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between nitrate and pesticide removal from ground water using adsorbents and NF and RO membranes.
    Tepus B; Simonic M; Petrinić I
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(2-3):1210-7. PubMed ID: 19541416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preparation of three-bore hollow fiber charged nanofiltration membrane for separation of organics and salts.
    Deng J; Zhang Y; Liu J; Zhang H
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 22173422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nanofiltration membrane fouling by oppositely charged macromolecules: investigation on flux behavior, foulant mass deposition, and solute rejection.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):8941-7. PubMed ID: 21928796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of operating parameters on spiramycin removal by nanofiltration membrane.
    Zhao C; Fan W; Wang T; Hou D; Luan Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1512-9. PubMed ID: 24135099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Separation of Cd and Ni from multicomponent aqueous solutions by nanofiltration and characterization of membrane using IT model.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Aug; 180(1-3):309-15. PubMed ID: 20452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Boron removal from aqueous solution by direct contact membrane distillation.
    Hou D; Wang J; Sun X; Luan Z; Zhao C; Ren X
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 May; 177(1-3):613-9. PubMed ID: 20080336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Degradation of atrazine by microwave-assisted electrodeless discharge mercury lamp in aqueous solution.
    Ta N; Hong J; Liu T; Sun C
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Nov; 138(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 16822612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.