These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18055743)

  • 1. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.
    Malone FD; Eddleman KA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1425-6; author reply 1426. PubMed ID: 18055743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Second-trimester amniocentesis vs. chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations.
    Antsaklis A; Souka AP; Daskalakis G; Kavalakis Y; Michalas S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 20(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 12423485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.
    Stone JL; Lockwood CJ
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 5(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 8490091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss.
    Caughey AB; Hopkins LM; Norton ME
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):612-6. PubMed ID: 16946222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [First trimester amniocentesis].
    Thoulon JM; Arnould P; Bretones S
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 Dec; 25(12):904-7. PubMed ID: 9497603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Nicolaides K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):780; author reply 780-1. PubMed ID: 17329535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss.
    Jenkins TM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):204-5; author reply 205-6. PubMed ID: 17197613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Complications from chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis].
    Vial Y; Sauthier P; Maillard-Brignon C; Bossart H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(5):476-80. PubMed ID: 7983305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss.
    Vaisbuch E; Appelman Z
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):205; author reply 205-6. PubMed ID: 17197614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [10 years chorionic villi sampling and the pros and cons of amniocentesis].
    Christiaens GC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Aug; 137(35):1757-61. PubMed ID: 7646588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling for fetal karyotyping.
    Bombard AT; Carter SM; Nitowsky HM
    Lancet; 1994 Sep; 344(8925):826. PubMed ID: 7916107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling for fetal karyotyping.
    Boulos A; Tsirigotis M; Yazdani N; Craft I
    Lancet; 1994 Sep; 344(8925):826. PubMed ID: 7916108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures 2005.
    Evans MI; Wapner RJ
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 16104671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second-trimester amniocentesis.
    Delaney JJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jun; 57(6):768. PubMed ID: 7231834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invasive genetic diagnosis in multiple pregnancies.
    Appelman Z; Furman B
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2005 Mar; 32(1):97-103, ix. PubMed ID: 15644292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spontaneous abortion after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Park IJ; Heller RH; Kaiser RM; Jones HW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Feb; 53(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 418974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Eddleman KA; Malone FD; Sullivan L; Dukes K; Berkowitz RL; Kharbutli Y; Porter TF; Luthy DA; Comstock CH; Saade GR; Klugman S; Dugoff L; Craigo SD; Timor-Tritsch IE; Carr SR; Wolfe HM; D'Alton ME
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 17077226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and laboratory experience with early amniocentesis.
    Thayer B; Braddock B; Spitzer K; Miller W
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1990; 26(3):58-63. PubMed ID: 2092855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risks of second-trimester amniocentesis: why all the fuss 30 years later?
    Mennuti MT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):586-8. PubMed ID: 18310359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Wapner RJ; Evans MI; Platt LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):780; author reply 780-1. PubMed ID: 17329536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.