205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18055807)
1. Assessing visual field clustering schemes using machine learning classifiers in standard perimetry.
Boden C; Chan K; Sample PA; Hao J; Lee TW; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Goldbaum MH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5582-90. PubMed ID: 18055807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields.
Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Chan K; Boden C; Lee TW; Vasile C; Boehm AG; Sejnowski T; Johnson CA; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2660-5. PubMed ID: 12147600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining functional and structural tests improves the diagnostic accuracy of relevance vector machine classifiers.
Racette L; Chiou CY; Hao J; Bowd C; Goldbaum MH; Zangwill LM; Lee TW; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
J Glaucoma; 2010 Mar; 19(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 19528827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis.
Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using unsupervised learning with variational bayesian mixture of factor analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.
Sample PA; Chan K; Boden C; Lee TW; Blumenthal EZ; Weinreb RN; Bernd A; Pascual J; Hao J; Sejnowski T; Goldbaum MH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 45(8):2596-605. PubMed ID: 15277482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma.
Shah NN; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA; Hoffmann EM; Zangwill LM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1593-602. PubMed ID: 16949444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Bowd C; Hao J; Tavares IM; Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Lee TW; Sample PA; Weinreb RN; Goldbaum MH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):945-53. PubMed ID: 18326717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain OCT and standard automated perimetry.
Silva FR; Vidotti VG; Cremasco F; Dias M; Gomi ES; Costa VP
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 23929078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human Versus Machine: Comparing a Deep Learning Algorithm to Human Gradings for Detecting Glaucoma on Fundus Photographs.
Jammal AA; Thompson AC; Mariottoni EB; Berchuck SI; Urata CN; Estrela T; Wakil SM; Costa VP; Medeiros FA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 211():123-131. PubMed ID: 31730838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
Zeppieri M; Brusini P; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Salvetat ML
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 149(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 19800607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry.
Goldbaum MH; Sample PA; Chan K; Williams J; Lee TW; Blumenthal E; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sejnowski T; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 11773027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unsupervised machine learning with independent component analysis to identify areas of progression in glaucomatous visual fields.
Sample PA; Boden C; Zhang Z; Pascual J; Lee TW; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Crowston JG; Hoffmann EM; Medeiros FA; Sejnowski T; Goldbaum M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3684-92. PubMed ID: 16186350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unsupervised learning with independent component analysis can identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.
Goldbaum MH
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2005; 103():270-80. PubMed ID: 17057807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of psychophysical and structural injury in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and normal standard automated perimetry.
Bagga H; Feuer WJ; Greenfield DS
Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 124(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 16476885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning models based on the dimensionality reduction of standard automated perimetry data for glaucoma diagnosis.
Lee SD; Lee JH; Choi YG; You HC; Kang JH; Jun CH
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Mar; 94():110-116. PubMed ID: 30871677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma.
Greaney MJ; Hoffman DC; Garway-Heath DF; Nakla M; Coleman AL; Caprioli J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):140-5. PubMed ID: 11773024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between patterns of visual field loss and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements.
Hoffmann EM; Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Boden C; Bowd C; Bourne RR; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):463-471. PubMed ID: 16490491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
