These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18056881)

  • 1. Directional benefit in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts T; Galster J; Tharpe AM
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 18056881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Head angle and elevation in classroom environments: implications for amplification.
    Ricketts TA; Galster J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):516-25. PubMed ID: 18367693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of in-the-ear microphone directionality on sound direction identification.
    Chung K; Neuman AC; Higgins M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 18397031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field evaluation of an asymmetric directional microphone fitting.
    Cord MT; Walden BE; Surr RK; Dittberner AB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Mar; 18(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 17479617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Directional Microphone Hearing Aids in School Environments: Working Toward Optimization.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM; Galster J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):263-275. PubMed ID: 28114614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-frequency gain compensation in directional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P
    Am J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 11(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 12227355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of room acoustics and sound-field amplification on word recognition performance in young adult listeners in suboptimal listening conditions.
    Larsen JB; Vega A; Ribera JE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 18519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 2: verification of different approaches to estimating directional benefit.
    Dittberner AB; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17204898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of measurements of the characteristics of directional microphone hearing aids in an IAC test room and an anechoic chamber.
    Brey RH; Caustin EI; McPherson JH
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):173-81. PubMed ID: 853009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Directional effects on infants and young children in real life: implications for amplification.
    Ching TY; O'Brien A; Dillon H; Chalupper J; Hartley L; Hartley D; Raicevich G; Hain J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1241-54. PubMed ID: 19564437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unaided and aided performance with a directional open-fit hearing aid.
    Valente M; Mispagel KM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 18569105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term usage of modern signal processing by listeners with severe or profound hearing loss: a retrospective survey.
    Keidser G; Hartley D; Carter L
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 18840704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Apr; 10(4):180-9. PubMed ID: 10941709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of multimicrophone noise reduction systems on sound source localization by users of binaural hearing aids.
    Van den Bogaert T; Doclo S; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):484-97. PubMed ID: 18646992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.