BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18057908)

  • 1. Integrating the acoustics of running speech into the pure tone audiogram: a step from audibility to intelligibility and disability.
    Corthals P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18057908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The performance/intensity function: an underused resource.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):479-91. PubMed ID: 18469711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual speech reception in noise and self-perceived hearing disability in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Corthals P; Vinck B; De Vel E; Van Cauwenberge P
    Audiology; 1997; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 9063560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Intelligibility of monosyllables in relation to tone hearing in noise-induced hearing loss].
    Tymnik G; Stange E; Lessing G; Zobelt U
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 Jun; 66(6):335-7. PubMed ID: 3626717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Band filtration of the speech signal: speech perception in health status and in sensorineural hearing loss].
    Petrov SM
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2000; (3):55-6. PubMed ID: 10846492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram.
    Bamford JM; Wilson IM; Atkinson D; Bench J
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Feb; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7214068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss.
    McAuliffe MJ; Wilding PJ; Rickard NA; O'Beirne GA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 22232404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Channell RW; Conklin B; Kim M; Wong L
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 21319936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The AMA method of estimation of hearing disability: a validation study.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):732-40. PubMed ID: 21694598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.
    Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
    Jenstad LM; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.