122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18058354)
1. Comparison of the temporal hemifield and nasal hemifield sensitivity in patients with early-onset convergent strabismus.
Polati M; Malta RF; Alves CA
Strabismus; 2007; 15(4):181-91. PubMed ID: 18058354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity in the nasal and temporal hemifields in children treated for cataract.
Bowering ER; Maurer D; Lewis TL; Brent HP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Dec; 34(13):3501-9. PubMed ID: 8258506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Co-development of VEP motion response and binocular vision in normal infants and infantile esotropes.
Birch EE; Fawcett S; Stager D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1719-23. PubMed ID: 10845591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between foveal threshold and visual acuity using the Humphrey visual field analyzer.
Flaxel CJ; Samples JR; Dustin L
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):875-7. PubMed ID: 17452176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of local differential luminance sensitivity (dls) between Oculus Twinfield Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer 630 (HFA I) in normal volunteers of varying ages].
Lorch L; Dietrich TJ; Schwabe R; Schiefer U
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Dec; 218(12):782-94. PubMed ID: 11805870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between visual acuity and nasal field thresholds in patients with temporal hemianopia.
Manor RS; Dickerman Z
J Clin Neuroophthalmol; 1991 Mar; 11(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 1827465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferonasal quadrant of the visual field is not constricted in patients with infantile esotropia when evaluated by means of automated perimetry.
Haefliger IO; Safran AB; Mermillod B; Roth A
J Clin Neuroophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 10(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 2141852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal modulation perimetry: the effects of aging and eccentricity on sensitivity in normals.
Casson EJ; Johnson CA; Nelson-Quigg JM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 34(11):3096-102. PubMed ID: 8407217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of optic disc configuration and clustered visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects.
Nagai-Kusuhara A; Nakamura M; Kanamori A; Negi A
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19142137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability.
Hong S; Narkiewicz J; Kardon RH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Apr; 42(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 11274072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual function in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: effect of Vision Restoration Therapy--a pilot study.
Jung CS; Bruce B; Newman NJ; Biousse V
J Neurol Sci; 2008 May; 268(1-2):145-9. PubMed ID: 18207164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal children.
Quinn LM; Gardiner SK; Wheeler DT; Newkirk M; Johnson CA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 17046702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Points of a normal visual field are not statistically independent.
Lachenmayr BJ; Kiermeir U; Kojetinsky S
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 May; 4(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 7663331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anomalies of motion perception in infantile esotropia.
Fawcett S; Raymond JE; Astle WF; Skov CM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Apr; 39(5):724-35. PubMed ID: 9538879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monocular acuity and stereopsis in infantile esotropia.
Birch EE; Stager DR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Nov; 26(11):1624-30. PubMed ID: 4055294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptation mechanisms, eccentricity profiles, and clinical implementation of red-on-white perimetry.
Zele AJ; Dang TM; O'Loughlin RK; Guymer RH; Harper A; Vingrys AJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 May; 85(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 18451735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion detection in normal infants and young patients with infantile esotropia.
Bosworth RG; Birch EE
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1557-67. PubMed ID: 15781073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
