These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18060265)

  • 1. Influence of the power level of an ultra-sonic system on dental cavity preparation.
    Josgrilberg EB; Guimarães Mde S; Pansani CA; Cordeiro Rde C
    Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 18060265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative cutting effectiveness of an ultrasonic diamond tip and a high-speed diamond bur.
    Lima LM; Motisuki C; Corat EJ; Santos-Pinto L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19357615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cutting characteristics of dental diamond burs made with CVD technology.
    Lima LM; Motisuki C; dos Santos-Pinto L; dos Santos-Pinto A; Corat EJ
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 16878210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of CVDentUS diamond tips for ultrasound in cavity preparation.
    Predebon JC; Flório FM; Basting RT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Jul; 7(3):50-8. PubMed ID: 16820807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principles of proximal cavity preparation and finishing with ultrasonic diamond tips.
    Krejci I; Dietschi D; Lutz FU
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 10(3):295-8; quiz 300. PubMed ID: 9655063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of grain size coating and shaft angulation of different diamond tips on dental cutting.
    Santos-Pinto L; Bortoletto CC; Oliveira AC; Santos-Pinto A; Zuanon AC; Lima LM
    J Conserv Dent; 2011 Apr; 14(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 21814352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal microleakage in cavities prepared with CVD tip and 245 bur.
    Oliveira J; Dorado L; Koch D; Scur A; Barbosa A
    Dent Implantol Update; 2009 Mar; 20(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 19278202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonic versus high-speed cavity preparation: analysis of increases in pulpal temperature and time to complete preparation.
    Vanderlei AD; Borges AL; Cavalcanti BN; Rode SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 100(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 18672127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of ultrasound and diamond burs treatments on microtensile bond strength.
    Conde A; Mainieri V; Mota EG; Oshima HM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 23059576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the interfacial micromorphology of adhesive systems in cavities prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG, Er:YAG laser and bur.
    Aranha AC; De Paula Eduardo C; Gutknecht N; Marques MM; Ramalho KM; Apel C
    Microsc Res Tech; 2007 Aug; 70(8):745-51. PubMed ID: 17394200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid layer width after conventional diamond, carbide and ultra-sound CVD burs.
    Pereira Nogueira P; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; do Rego MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 23342567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.
    Aranha AC; Turbino ML; Powell GL; Eduardo Cde P
    Lasers Surg Med; 2005 Aug; 37(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 16037969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of various grit burs on marginal integrity of resin composite restorations.
    Nishimura K; Ikeda M; Yoshikawa T; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    J Med Dent Sci; 2005 Mar; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15868736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing.
    Ferrazzano GF; Ingenito A; Alcidi B; Sangianantoni G; Schiavone MG; Cantile T
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Dec; 18(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 29380610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro study comparing root-end cavities prepared by diamond-coated and stainless steel ultrasonic retrotips.
    Peters CI; Peters OA; Barbakow F
    Int Endod J; 2001 Mar; 34(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 11307263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temperature variation on root surface with three root-end cavity preparation techniques.
    Bodrumlu E; Keskiner I; Sumer M; Telcioglu NT
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2013; 141(9-10):597-601. PubMed ID: 24364220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation on the root apex.
    Abedi HR; Van Mierlo BL; Wilder-Smith P; Torabinejad M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 7552887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.