158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18060681)
1. Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Müntener M; Epstein JI; Hernandez DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Mangold L; Humphreys E; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Nielsen ME
Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):767-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 18060681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7.
Serkin FB; Soderdahl DW; Cullen J; Chen Y; Hernandez J
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 19117774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of biochemical relapse-free survival between primary Gleason score 3 and primary Gleason score 4 for biopsy Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.
Burdick MJ; Reddy CA; Ulchaker J; Angermeier K; Altman A; Chehade N; Mahadevan A; Kupelian PA; Klein EA; Ciezki JP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1439-45. PubMed ID: 18963536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the biopsy Gleason score important in predicting outcomes for patients after radical prostatectomy once the pathological Gleason score is known?
Vira MA; Guzzo T; Heitjan DF; Tomaszewski JE; D'Amico A; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2008 May; 101(10):1232-6. PubMed ID: 18419697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Gonzalgo ML; Bastian PJ; Mangold LA; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Partin AW
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16413345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of modeled PSA clearance on biochemical relapse free survival after radical prostatectomy.
You B; Girard P; Paparel P; Freyer G; Ruffion A; Charrié A; Hénin E; Tod M; Perrin P
Prostate; 2009 Sep; 69(12):1325-33. PubMed ID: 19475643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between upgrading of prostate biopsy and biochemical failure and unfavorable pathology after radical prostatectomy.
Ozden C; Oztekin CV; Ugurlu O; Gokkaya S; Yaris M; Memis A
Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 19752607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in distribution and prognostic significance of Gleason grades on radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens between 1989 and 2001.
Sengupta S; Slezak JM; Blute ML; Leibovich BC; Sebo TJ; Myers RP; Cheville JC; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2630-5. PubMed ID: 16703592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
May M; Kaufmann O; Hammermann F; Loy V; Siegsmund M
BJU Int; 2007 Mar; 99(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 17155973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a progression of histologic grade from radical prostatectomy to local recurrence in patients with clinically isolated local recurrence following surgery?
Choo R; Sugar L; Hong E; Mackenzie K; DeBoer G; Danjoux C; Morton G; Klotz L
Can J Urol; 2003 Oct; 10(5):1981-5. PubMed ID: 14633325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathologic T2 stage subgroups and recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
DeCastro GJ; McCann T; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6):1214-8. PubMed ID: 18597825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Crispen PL; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Sebo TJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):95-104; discussion 104. PubMed ID: 19012937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
