These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18060681)
1. Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. Müntener M; Epstein JI; Hernandez DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Mangold L; Humphreys E; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Nielsen ME Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):767-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 18060681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade. Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7. Serkin FB; Soderdahl DW; Cullen J; Chen Y; Hernandez J Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 19117774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of biochemical relapse-free survival between primary Gleason score 3 and primary Gleason score 4 for biopsy Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Burdick MJ; Reddy CA; Ulchaker J; Angermeier K; Altman A; Chehade N; Mahadevan A; Kupelian PA; Klein EA; Ciezki JP Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1439-45. PubMed ID: 18963536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy. Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the biopsy Gleason score important in predicting outcomes for patients after radical prostatectomy once the pathological Gleason score is known? Vira MA; Guzzo T; Heitjan DF; Tomaszewski JE; D'Amico A; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB BJU Int; 2008 May; 101(10):1232-6. PubMed ID: 18419697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Gonzalgo ML; Bastian PJ; Mangold LA; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Partin AW Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16413345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of modeled PSA clearance on biochemical relapse free survival after radical prostatectomy. You B; Girard P; Paparel P; Freyer G; Ruffion A; Charrié A; Hénin E; Tod M; Perrin P Prostate; 2009 Sep; 69(12):1325-33. PubMed ID: 19475643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between upgrading of prostate biopsy and biochemical failure and unfavorable pathology after radical prostatectomy. Ozden C; Oztekin CV; Ugurlu O; Gokkaya S; Yaris M; Memis A Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 19752607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in distribution and prognostic significance of Gleason grades on radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens between 1989 and 2001. Sengupta S; Slezak JM; Blute ML; Leibovich BC; Sebo TJ; Myers RP; Cheville JC; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2630-5. PubMed ID: 16703592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years. Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival. Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. May M; Kaufmann O; Hammermann F; Loy V; Siegsmund M BJU Int; 2007 Mar; 99(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 17155973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker? Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a progression of histologic grade from radical prostatectomy to local recurrence in patients with clinically isolated local recurrence following surgery? Choo R; Sugar L; Hong E; Mackenzie K; DeBoer G; Danjoux C; Morton G; Klotz L Can J Urol; 2003 Oct; 10(5):1981-5. PubMed ID: 14633325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathologic T2 stage subgroups and recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. DeCastro GJ; McCann T; Benson MC; McKiernan JM Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6):1214-8. PubMed ID: 18597825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer. Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy. Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Crispen PL; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Sebo TJ; Blute ML J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):95-104; discussion 104. PubMed ID: 19012937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]