These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18060719)

  • 1. Simulation study on active noise control for a 4-T MRI scanner.
    Li M; Lim TC; Lee JH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Apr; 26(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 18060719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results.
    McJury M; Stewart RW; Crawford D; Toma E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 9201679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In situ active control of noise in a 4 T MRI scanner.
    Li M; Rudd B; Lim TC; Lee JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Sep; 34(3):662-9. PubMed ID: 21751284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parallel feedback active noise control of MRI acoustic noise with signal decomposition using hybrid RLS-NLMS adaptive algorithms.
    Ganguly A; Krishna Vemuri SH; Panahi I
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():3220-3. PubMed ID: 25570676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Structure Design Method for Reduction of MRI Acoustic Noise.
    Nan J; Zong N; Chen Q; Zhang L; Zheng Q; Xia Y
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():6253428. PubMed ID: 29234459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an independent linear model for acoustic noise on a conventional MRI scanner and implications for acoustic noise reduction.
    Wu Z; Kim YC; Khoo MC; Nayak KS
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1613-20. PubMed ID: 23757158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards undistorted and noise-free speech in an MRI scanner: correlation subtraction followed by spectral noise gating.
    Inouye JM; Blemker SS; Inouye DI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1019-22. PubMed ID: 24606243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner.
    More SR; Lim TC; Li M; Holland CK; Boyce SE; Lee JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 16463341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Active cancellation system of acoustic noise in MR imaging.
    Chen CK; Chiueh TD; Chen JH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Feb; 46(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 9932340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive speech enhancement using directional microphone in a 4-T MRI scanner.
    Sun G; Li M; Rudd BW; Lim TC; Osterhage J; Fugate EM; Lee JH
    MAGMA; 2015 Oct; 28(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 25894814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequence-based acoustic noise reduction of clinical MRI scans.
    Heismann B; Ott M; Grodzki D
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Mar; 73(3):1104-9. PubMed ID: 24889327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural-acoustic modal analysis of cylindrical shells: application to MRI scanner systems.
    Li G; Mechefske CK
    MAGMA; 2009 Dec; 22(6):353-64. PubMed ID: 19859754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid feedforward-feedback active noise reduction for hearing protection and communication.
    Ray LR; Solbeck JA; Streeter AD; Collier RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2026-36. PubMed ID: 17069300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise generated by a 4.7 T experimental system.
    Counter SA; Olofsson A; Borg E; Bjelke B; Häggström A; Grahn HF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Sep; 120(6):739-43. PubMed ID: 11099151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultra-broadband local active noise control with remote acoustic sensing.
    Xiao T; Qiu X; Halkon B
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20784. PubMed ID: 33247208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comprehensive experimental study of micro-perforated panel acoustic absorbers in MRI scanners.
    Li G; Mechefske CK
    MAGMA; 2010 Jun; 23(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 20464444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between hybrid feedforward-feedback, feedforward, and feedback structures for active noise control of fMRI noise.
    Reddy RM; Panahi IM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():266-9. PubMed ID: 19162644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An efficient feedback active noise control algorithm based on reduced-order linear predictive modeling of FMRI acoustic noise.
    Kannan G; Milani AA; Panahi IM; Briggs RW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 58(12):3303-9. PubMed ID: 21134809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
    Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model gradient coil employing active acoustic control for MRI.
    Haywood B; Chapman B; Mansfield P
    MAGMA; 2007 Dec; 20(5-6):223-31. PubMed ID: 18004601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.