BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18061741)

  • 1. Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: a systematic review.
    Fueki K; Kimoto K; Ogawa T; Garrett NR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):470-7. PubMed ID: 18061741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant supported dentures and masticatory performance.
    Pjetursson BE
    Evid Based Dent; 2008; 9(1):22. PubMed ID: 18364691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of mandibular ridge height on masticatory performance with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures.
    Kimoto K; Garrett NR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 12939003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Mean Bite Force and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary and Mandibular Complete Dentures vs Mandibular Implant-supported Over Denture.
    Kumar A; Karthik KVGC; Sunkala L; Bejagam V; Rathore KK; Rai P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May; 23(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 35986459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.
    Salami ZA; Jasser EM; Makzoumé JED; Boulos PJA
    Gen Dent; 2020; 68(6):60-64. PubMed ID: 33136048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review of studies comparing conventional complete denture and implant retained overdenture.
    Kutkut A; Bertoli E; Frazer R; Pinto-Sinai G; Fuentealba Hidalgo R; Studts J
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28666845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency.
    Farias Neto A; Pereira BM; Xitara RL; Germano AR; Ribeiro JA; Mestriner Junior W; Carreiro Ada F
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e650-5. PubMed ID: 21916952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of mandibular conventional denture and overdenture on quality of life and masticatory efficiency.
    Cardoso RG; Melo LA; Barbosa GA; Calderon PD; Germano AR; Mestriner W; Carreiro AD
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 Oct; 30(1):e102. PubMed ID: 27737356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
    Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
    Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients.
    Turkyilmaz I; Company AM; McGlumphy EA
    Gerodontology; 2010 Mar; 27(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 19291086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with edentulous patients' willingness about implant-supported complete denture: a multivariate analysis.
    Veríssimo AH; Ribeiro AKC; de Medeiros AKB; de Melo LA; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1835-1842. PubMed ID: 34491447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part II. Comparisons of masticatory performance.
    Garrett NR; Kapur KK; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Chen T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):632-40. PubMed ID: 9627891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Masticatory performance with mandibular implant-retained overdentures].
    Slagter AP; Geertman ME; Fontijn-Tekamp FA; Witter DJ; van Waas MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Nov; 102(11):449-52. PubMed ID: 11837089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of masticatory function of mandibular implant-supported overdenture wearers: A 3-year prospective study.
    Khalid T; Yunus N; Ibrahim N; Saleh NBM; Goode D; Masood M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):674-681. PubMed ID: 31952858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of the attachments on clinical outcomes of mandibular distal extension implant-supported removable partial dentures: A systematic review.
    Zhang H; Ramos V; Bratos M; Liu PP; He W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 34301416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do implant-supported prostheses affect bioavailability of nutrients of complete and partially edentulous patients? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Bezerra AP; Gama LT; Pereira LJ; van der Bilt A; Peyron MA; Rodrigues Garcia RCM; Gonçalves TMSV
    Clin Nutr; 2021 May; 40(5):3235-3249. PubMed ID: 33676775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Placement of a distal implant to convert a mandibular removable Kennedy class I to an implant-supported partial removable Class III dental prosthesis: A systematic review.
    Zancopé K; Abrão GM; Karam FK; Neves FD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):528-33.e3. PubMed ID: 25818673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment.
    Ohkubo C; Kobayashi M; Suzuki Y; Hosoi T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19216279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.