291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18061867)
1. Cervical cancer prevention--cervical screening: science in evolution.
Safaeian M; Solomon D; Castle PE
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2007 Dec; 34(4):739-60, ix. PubMed ID: 18061867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is cervical screening necessary in older women?
Cruickshank ME
Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):351-3. PubMed ID: 11843936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
Reust CE
J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
Payne L; Lavis P
Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for cervical cancer, a priority in Zimbabwe?
Rutgers S; Verkuyl D
Cent Afr J Med; 2000 Mar; 46(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 14674218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Linder J
Cytopathology; 2002 Feb; 13(1):66. PubMed ID: 11985572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women.
Lawson HW; Henson R; Bobo JK; Kaeser MK
MMWR Recomm Rep; 2000 Mar; 49(RR-2):37-55. PubMed ID: 15580731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.
Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R
Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Economic aspects of using selected biomarkers in cervical cancer screening].
Rokita W; Kedzia W; Gaj A; Kulig B
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):774-7. PubMed ID: 21117306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer can be controlled.
Rogo KO
East Afr Med J; 2001 Feb; 78(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 11682944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical screening program for Sri Lanka--can we afford it?
Sirisena J
Ceylon Med J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10643099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The current status of the Papanicolaou smear.
Shingleton HM; Patrick RL; Johnston WW; Smith RA
CA Cancer J Clin; 1995; 45(5):305-20. PubMed ID: 7656133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing secondary prevention methods for cervical cancer: costs and benefits in managed care.
MacDonald CF
Am J Manag Care; 2008 Jun; 14(6 Suppl 1):S185-92. PubMed ID: 18611086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for cervical carcinoma in older women. American Geriatrics Society.
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2001 May; 49(5):655-7. PubMed ID: 11380762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical screening in older women.
Ogilvie D
Cytopathology; 2002 Oct; 13(5):333. PubMed ID: 12421452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in developing countries.
Suba EJ; Frable WJ; Raab SS
N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(14):1535-6; author reply 1535-6. PubMed ID: 16598056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Moseley R
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 11952756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cost effectiveness analysis of screening strategies for cervical cancer in Tunisia].
Lazaar HB; Aounallah-Skhiri H; Oueslati F; Frikha H; Achour N; Hsairi M
East Mediterr Health J; 2010 Jun; 16(6):602-8. PubMed ID: 20799586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the sensitivity of cervical cytology: what are the issues?
Myers ER
Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):838-40. PubMed ID: 11067380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
