These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18062045)

  • 1. Bearing surface design changes affect contact patterns in total knee arthroplasty.
    Cottrell JM; Townsend E; Lipman J; Sculco TP; Wright TM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():127-31. PubMed ID: 18062045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts.
    Engh GA; Zimmerman RL; Parks NL; Engh CA
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):28-32. PubMed ID: 19427754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wear-pattern analysis in retrieved tibial inserts of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee prostheses.
    Lu YC; Huang CH; Chang TK; Ho FY; Cheng CK; Huang CH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 20357325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polyethylene damage and deformation on fixed-bearing, non-conforming unicondylar knee replacements corresponding to progressive changes in alignment and fixation.
    Harman MK; Schmitt S; Rössing S; Banks SA; Sharf HP; Viceconti M; Hodge WA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Jul; 25(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 20457480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mobile-bearing knees reduce rotational asymmetric wear.
    Ho FY; Ma HM; Liau JJ; Yeh CR; Huang CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 462():143-9. PubMed ID: 17483732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinematics of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Dennis DA; Komistek RD
    Instr Course Lect; 2005; 54():207-20. PubMed ID: 15948448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of polyethylene degradation in mobile bearing knees: a retrieval analysis of the Anterior-Posterior-Glide (APG) and Rotating Platform (RP) Low Contact Stress (LCS) knee.
    Kop AM; Swarts E
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Jun; 78(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 17611851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backside damage corresponding to articular damage in retrieved tibial polyethylene inserts.
    Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():137-44. PubMed ID: 17242615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics.
    Jones VC; Barton DC; Fitzpatrick DP; Auger DD; Stone MH; Fisher J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 10572623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.
    Liu T; Esposito C; Elpers M; Wright T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 26084848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs.
    Stukenborg-Colsman C; Ostermeier S; Hurschler C; Wirth CJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):638-46. PubMed ID: 12553510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unicondylar knee retrieval analysis.
    Manson TT; Kelly NH; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Westrich GH
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):108-11. PubMed ID: 20541358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibial knee components.
    Collier JP; Mayor MB; McNamara JL; Surprenant VA; Jensen RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Dec; (273):232-42. PubMed ID: 1959276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements.
    McEwen HM; Barnett PI; Bell CJ; Farrar R; Auger DD; Stone MH; Fisher J
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):357-65. PubMed ID: 15598464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post damage in contemporary posterior-stabilized tibial inserts: influence of implant design and clinical relevance.
    ; Medel FJ; Kurtz SM; Sharkey PF; Austin MS; Klein GR; Cohen AR; Patel H; Goldberg VM; Kraay MJ; Rimnac CM
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 21575793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tibiofemoral contact behavior is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA.
    Most E; Sultan PG; Park SE; Papannagari R; Li G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Nov; 452():59-64. PubMed ID: 16980895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of polyethylene tibial insert damage from in vivo function and in vitro wear simulation.
    Harman MK; DesJardins J; Benson L; Banks SA; LaBerge M; Hodge WA
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Apr; 27(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 18932244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface stress: a factor influencing ultra high molecular weight polyethylene durability in mobile-bearing knee design.
    Morra EA; Heim CS; Greenwald AS
    Orthopedics; 2007 May; 30(5 Suppl):35-8. PubMed ID: 17549865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results.
    Callaghan JJ; Insall JN; Greenwald AS; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Murray DW; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Dorr LD
    Instr Course Lect; 2001; 50():431-49. PubMed ID: 11372345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant design influences tibial post wear damage in posterior-stabilized knees.
    Dolan MM; Kelly NH; Nguyen JT; Wright TM; Haas SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jan; 469(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 20711697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.