These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18062535)

  • 1. The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts.
    Kendeou P; Van den Broek P
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1567-77. PubMed ID: 18062535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Materials Matter: An Exploration of Text Complexity and Its Effects on Middle School Readers' Comprehension Processing.
    Dahl AC; Carlson SE; Renken M; McCarthy KS; Reynolds E
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2021 Apr; 52(2):702-716. PubMed ID: 33784193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study.
    Scrimin S; Mason L
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):387-406. PubMed ID: 26010020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neurocognitive Signatures of Naturalistic Reading of Scientific Texts: A Fixation-Related fMRI Study.
    Hsu CT; Clariana R; Schloss B; Li P
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10678. PubMed ID: 31337859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A measure of individual differences in readers' approaches to text and its relation to reading experience and reading comprehension.
    Calloway RC; Helder A; Perfetti CA
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):899-931. PubMed ID: 35505178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What you read versus what you know: Neural correlates of accessing context information and background knowledge in constructing a mental representation during reading.
    van Moort ML; Jolles DD; Koornneef A; van den Broek P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Nov; 149(11):2084-2101. PubMed ID: 32324023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation.
    van den Broek P
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5977):453-6. PubMed ID: 20413489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge.
    McNamara DS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 11301728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Vocabulary Intervention on Text Comprehension: Who Benefits?
    Duff D
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2019 Oct; 50(4):562-578. PubMed ID: 31600473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts.
    Millis KK; Simon S; tenBroek NS
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):232-46. PubMed ID: 9584432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children.
    Kraal A; Koornneef AW; Saab N; van den Broek PW
    Read Writ; 2018; 31(9):2017-2040. PubMed ID: 30416261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How word decoding skill impacts text memory: The centrality deficit and how domain knowledge can compensate.
    Miller AC; Keenan JM
    Ann Dyslexia; 2009 Dec; 59(2):99-113. PubMed ID: 19475514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J; Keenan JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 12776755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of macroprocessing skill on children's comprehension of expository text].
    Ishiwatari Y; Muramoto T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2011 Oct; 82(4):354-61. PubMed ID: 22117299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of knowledge in vivid text memory: an individual-differences investigation of recollection and familiarity.
    Long DL; Prat C; Johns C; Morris P; Jonathan E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):604-9. PubMed ID: 18567262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who do you refer to? How young students with mild intellectual disability confront anaphoric ambiguities in texts and sentences.
    Tavares G; Fajardo I; Ávila V; Salmerón L; Ferrer A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2015 Mar; 38():108-24. PubMed ID: 25556895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reading comprehension: think and know verbs.
    Pepi A; Alesi M
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Dec; 93(3 Pt 2):1247-60. PubMed ID: 14765598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Structure on the Memory for Procedural Text.
    Geiger JF; Downen SS
    Psychol Rep; 2021 Aug; 124(4):1621-1633. PubMed ID: 32698665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Interplay of Reader Goals, Working Memory, and Text Structure During Reading.
    Bohn-Gettler CM; Kendeou P
    Contemp Educ Psychol; 2014 Jul; 39(3):206-219. PubMed ID: 25018581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forming a belief: The contribution of comprehension to the evaluation and persuasive impact of argumentative text.
    Diakidoy IA; Christodoulou SA; Floros G; Iordanou K; Kargopoulos PV
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):300-15. PubMed ID: 25824097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.