380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18062541)
21. Does test-induced priming play a role in the creation of false memories?
Marsh EJ; McDermott KB; Roediger HL
Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 15098620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of test structure in creating false memories.
Coane JH; McBride DM
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17128601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. False memories: young and older adults think of semantic associates at the same rate, but young adults are more successful at source monitoring.
Dehon H; Bredart S
Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):191-7. PubMed ID: 15065942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Generative processing and emotional false memories: a generation "cost" for negative false memory formation but only after delay.
Knott L; Wilkinson S; Hellenthal M; Shah D; Howe ML
Cogn Emot; 2022 Nov; 36(7):1448-1457. PubMed ID: 36196863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. False memories in children. Evidence for a shift from phonological to semantic associations.
Dewhurst SA; Robinson CA
Psychol Sci; 2004 Nov; 15(11):782-6. PubMed ID: 15482451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Toward a model of false recall: experimental manipulation of encoding context and the collection of verbal reports.
Goodwin KA; Meissner CA; Ericsson KA
Mem Cognit; 2001 Sep; 29(6):806-19. PubMed ID: 11716054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Variability among Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists in eliciting false recall for people's names.
Mukai A
Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):547-61. PubMed ID: 17153826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Associative strength or gist extraction: Which matters when DRM lists have two critical lures?
Oliveira HM; Albuquerque PB; Saraiva M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):570-578. PubMed ID: 29431007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied.
Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21500088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Construal-level priming does not modulate memory performance in Deese-Roediger/McDermott paradigm.
Tse CS; Gu X; Zeng T; Chan YL
Memory; 2020 Oct; 28(9):1136-1156. PubMed ID: 32957837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A gender difference in the false recall of negative words: women DRM more than men.
Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; Knott LM
Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 21432635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence for adult age-invariance in associative false recognition.
Pansuwan T; Breuer F; Gazder T; Lau Z; Cueva S; Swanson L; Taylor M; Wilson M; Morcom AM
Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):172-186. PubMed ID: 31868124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.
Hege AC; Dodson CS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):787-95. PubMed ID: 15238023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Negative affect promotes encoding of and memory for details at the expense of the gist: affect, encoding, and false memories.
Storbeck J
Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(5):800-19. PubMed ID: 23134550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The reliability of the DRM paradigm as a measure of individual differences in false memories.
Blair IV; Lenton AP; Hastie R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):590-6. PubMed ID: 12412901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. False memory across languages: implicit associative response vs fuzzy trace views.
Cabeza R; Lennartson ER
Memory; 2005 Jan; 13(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15724903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The modality effect in false recognition: evidence for test-based monitoring.
Pierce BH; Gallo DA; Weiss JA; Schacter DL
Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1407-13. PubMed ID: 16615388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.
Mao WB; Yang ZL; Wang LS
Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 22043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A memory-interference versus the "dud"-effect account of a DRM false memory result: Fewer related targets at test, higher critical-lure false recognition.
Jou J; Hwang M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 35318582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The effect of encoding on false memory: examination on levels of processing and list presentation format].
Hamajima H
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Apr; 75(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 15724516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
