These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18062948)

  • 1. Reorientation in the real world: the development of landmark use and integration in a natural environment.
    Smith AD; Gilchrist ID; Cater K; Ikram N; Nott K; Hood BM
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1102-11. PubMed ID: 18062948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient.
    Learmonth AE; Newcombe NS; Huttenlocher J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Nov; 80(3):225-44. PubMed ID: 11583524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children.
    Hermer L; Spelke ES
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6484):57-9. PubMed ID: 8015605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size.
    Vallortigara G; Feruglio M; Sovrano VA
    Dev Sci; 2005 Sep; 8(5):393-401. PubMed ID: 16048511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reorientation and landmark-guided search by young children: evidence for two systems.
    Lee SA; Shusterman A; Spelke ES
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jul; 17(7):577-82. PubMed ID: 16866742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space.
    Sovrano VA; Bisazza A; Vallortigara G
    Cognition; 2005 Sep; 97(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16226559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Young children's use of features to reorient is more than just associative: further evidence against a modular view of spatial processing.
    Newcombe NS; Ratliff KR; Shallcross WL; Twyman AD
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jan; 13(1):213-20. PubMed ID: 20121877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Young children's ability to infer spatial relationships: evidence from a large, familiar environment.
    Herman JF; Shiraki JH; Miller BS
    Child Dev; 1985 Oct; 56(5):1195-203. PubMed ID: 4053739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments.
    Sturz BR; Bodily KD; Katz JS; Kelly DM
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Mar; 12(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18766392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures.
    Learmonth AE; Newcombe NS; Sheridan N; Jones M
    Dev Sci; 2008 May; 11(3):414-26. PubMed ID: 18466375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of landmark and beacon use in young children: evidence from a touchscreen search task.
    Sutton JE
    Dev Sci; 2006 Jan; 9(1):108-23. PubMed ID: 16445400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is language necessary for human spatial reorientation? Reconsidering evidence from dual task paradigms.
    Ratliff KR; Newcombe NS
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Mar; 56(2):142-63. PubMed ID: 17663986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental issues in cognitive mapping: the selection and utilization of environmental landmarks.
    Allen GL; Kirasic KC; Siegel AW; Herman JF
    Child Dev; 1979 Dec; 50(4):1062-70. PubMed ID: 535429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's use of landmarks: implications for modularity theory.
    Learmonth AE; Nadel L; Newcombe NS
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Jul; 13(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 12137136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
    Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's use of geometry for reorientation.
    Lee SA; Spelke ES
    Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):743-9. PubMed ID: 18801130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Searching and planning: young children's reasoning about past and future event sequences.
    McColgan KL; McCormack T
    Child Dev; 2008; 79(5):1477-97. PubMed ID: 18826537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies in landmark use by orangutans and human children.
    Marsh HL; Spetch ML; MacDonald SE
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jul; 14(4):487-502. PubMed ID: 21312049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Of mice (Mus musculus) and toddlers (Homo sapiens): evidence for species-general spatial reorientation.
    Twyman AD; Newcombe NS; Gould TJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19685977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-dependent use of local and global landmarks during escape: experiments using Columbian ground squirrels.
    Nesterova AP
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jul; 75(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 17462833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.