86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18062949)
1. Validating an imaging and analysis system for assessing torso deformities.
Ajemba PO; Durdle NG; Hill DL; Raso VJ
Comput Biol Med; 2008 Mar; 38(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 18062949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface reconstruction of torsos with and without scoliosis.
Emrani M; Kirdeikis R; Igwe P; Hill D; Adeeb S
J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2200-4. PubMed ID: 19647258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An active shape model for the reconstruction of scoliotic deformities from back shape data.
Huysmans T; Moens P; Van Audekercke R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):813-21. PubMed ID: 15963614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pre-processing range data for the analysis of torso shape and symmetry of scoliosis patients.
Kumar A; Ajemba P; Durdle N; Raso J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 123():483-7. PubMed ID: 17108472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterizing torso shape deformity in scoliosis using structured splines models.
Ajemba PO; Durdle NG; Raso VJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1652-62. PubMed ID: 19389691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of idiopathic scoliosis assessments between newly developed Milwaukee Topographic Scanner and Quantec.
Lim CH; Tassone C; Liu XC; Thometz JG; Lyon R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 176():255-8. PubMed ID: 22744503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Movement analysis of scoliotic subjects using Fastrak.
Rahmatalla A; Chockalingam N; Dangerfield P; Ahmed el-N; Cochrane T; Dove J; Maffulli N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():162-6. PubMed ID: 15457716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel solution for registration of stereo digital torso images of scoliosis patients.
Kumar A; Durdle N; Raso J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():161-5. PubMed ID: 18810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D reconstruction and analysis of the whole trunk surface for non-invasive follow-up of scoliotic deformities.
Pazos V; Cheriet F; Labelle H; Dansereau J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():296-9. PubMed ID: 15457741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thoracic kyphosis angle measurements with ISIS2.
Berryman F; Pynsent P; Fairbank J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():68-71. PubMed ID: 18810002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-contrast-enhanced MR portography with time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: comparison of imaging with three-dimensional half-fourier fast spin-echo and true steady-state free-precession sequences.
Shimada K; Isoda H; Okada T; Kamae T; Arizono S; Hirokawa Y; Shibata T; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 May; 29(5):1140-6. PubMed ID: 19388119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems--exemplified on the Vicon-460 system.
Windolf M; Götzen N; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2776-80. PubMed ID: 18672241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scoliosis follow-up using noninvasive trunk surface acquisition.
Adankon MM; Chihab N; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Cheriet F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Aug; 60(8):2262-70. PubMed ID: 23508244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cobb angles measured manually, calculated from 3-D spinal reconstruction, and estimated from torso asymmetry.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Aug; 5(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 12186706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional shape analysis of the scoliotic spine using MR tomography and rasterstereography.
Hierholzer E; Hackenberg L
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():184-9. PubMed ID: 15457720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique vs. conventional respiratory-triggered technique for free-breathing 3D MRCP: an initial prospective comparative study using healthy volunteers.
Morita S; Ueno E; Suzuki K; Machida H; Fujimura M; Kojima S; Hirata M; Ohnishi T; Imura C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 18777550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic algorithm-neural network estimation of cobb angle from torso asymmetry in scoliosis.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
J Biomech Eng; 2002 Oct; 124(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 12405591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voxel-based iterative sensitivity (VBIS) analysis: methods and a validation of intensity scaling for T2-weighted imaging of hippocampal sclerosis.
Abbott DF; Pell GS; Pardoe H; Jackson GD
Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):812-9. PubMed ID: 18996207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity of voxel-based morphometry analysis to choice of imaging protocol at 3 T.
Tardif CL; Collins DL; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):827-38. PubMed ID: 18996205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast 3D iterative image reconstruction for SPECT with rotating slat collimators.
Holen RV; Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; De Beenhouwer J; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):715-29. PubMed ID: 19131666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
