BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18063168)

  • 1. Single-row suture anchor repair of the rotator cuff is biomechanically equivalent to double-row repair in a bovine model.
    Mahar A; Tamborlane J; Oka R; Esch J; Pedowitz RA
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1265-70. PubMed ID: 18063168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical comparison of tendon-bone interface motion and cyclic loading between single-row, triple-loaded cuff repairs and double-row, suture-tape cuff repairs using biocomposite anchors.
    Barber FA; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Sep; 28(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 22592123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.
    Nelson CO; Sileo MJ; Grossman MG; Serra-Hsu F
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Aug; 24(8):941-8. PubMed ID: 18657744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Schroeder FA; Aziz-Jacobo J; Mays MM; Rapley JH
    Arthroscopy; 2010 Mar; 26(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 20206040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study.
    Milano G; Grasso A; Zarelli D; Deriu L; Cillo M; Fabbriciani C
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Jan; 16(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 17684730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair.
    Kim DH; Elattrache NS; Tibone JE; Jun BJ; DeLaMora SN; Kvitne RS; Lee TQ
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Mar; 34(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 16282581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Comparison of Standard and Linked Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs in a Human Cadaver Model.
    Meisel AF; Henninger HB; Barber FA; Getelman MH
    Arthroscopy; 2017 May; 33(5):938-944. PubMed ID: 28089497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparable biomechanical results for a modified single-row rotator cuff reconstruction using triple-loaded suture anchors versus a suture-bridging double-row repair.
    Lorbach O; Kieb M; Raber F; Busch LC; Kohn D; Pape D
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Feb; 28(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22112611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable sutureless screw anchor versus suture anchor fixation for rotator cuff repair.
    Lee S; Mahar A; Bynum K; Pedowitz R
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Jan; 21(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15650665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of footprint contact area and pressure using a triple-row modification of the suture-bridge technique for rotator cuff repair.
    Ostrander RV; McKinney BI
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1406-12. PubMed ID: 22305920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suture number determines strength of rotator cuff repair.
    Jost PW; Khair MM; Chen DX; Wright TM; Kelly AM; Rodeo SA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94(14):e100. PubMed ID: 22810407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
    Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biomechanical comparison of 2 transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques using bioabsorbable anchors: cyclic loading and failure behavior.
    Spang JT; Buchmann S; Brucker PU; Kouloumentas P; Obst T; Schröder M; Burgkart R; Imhoff AB
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Aug; 25(8):872-9. PubMed ID: 19664507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Load response and gap formation in a single-row cruciate suture rotator cuff repair.
    Huntington L; Richardson M; Sobol T; Caldow J; Ackland DC
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jun; 87(6):483-487. PubMed ID: 28124403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation.
    Ma CB; Comerford L; Wilson J; Puttlitz CM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Feb; 88(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 16452754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical Analysis of Medial-Row All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation for Rotator Cuff Repair in a Pair-Matched Cadaveric Model.
    Bernardoni ED; Frank RM; Veera SS; Waterman BR; Griffin JW; Shewman EF; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    Arthroscopy; 2019 May; 35(5):1370-1376. PubMed ID: 31000387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.
    Zheng N; Harris HW; Andrews JR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1034-42. PubMed ID: 18451396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison between single-row with triple-loaded suture anchor and suture-bridge double-row rotator cuff repair.
    He HB; Hu Y; Li C; Li CG; Wang MC; Zhu HF; Yan ZW; Pan CL; Wang T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Sep; 21(1):629. PubMed ID: 32972397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Smith CD; Alexander S; Hill AM; Huijsmans PE; Bull AM; Amis AA; De Beer JF; Wallace AL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88(11):2425-31. PubMed ID: 17079400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical analysis of footprint contact pressure and strength in an ovine model.
    Peters KS; Lam PH; Murrell GA
    Arthroscopy; 2010 Jul; 26(7):877-84. PubMed ID: 20620786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.