These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18063260)

  • 1. Letter to the Editor.
    Kopylev L; Fox J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Mar; 50(2):271-2. PubMed ID: 18063260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighted multiplicity adjustments for animal carcinogenicity tests.
    Westfall PH; Soper KA
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Mar; 8(1):23-44; discussion 45-53. PubMed ID: 9547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overall false positive rates in tests for linear trend in tumor incidence in animal carcinogenicity studies of new drugs.
    Lin KK; Rahman MA
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Mar; 8(1):1-15; discussion 17-22. PubMed ID: 9547425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of historical controls in time-adjusted trend tests for carcinogenicity.
    Ibrahim JG; Ryan LM
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1478-85. PubMed ID: 8962464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter to the editor: effects of MTBE on Leydig cell tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats: range of possible poly-3 results.
    Beck B
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Apr; 50(3):430. PubMed ID: 18423267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: pulmonary tumor types induced in Wistar rats of the so-called "19-dust study".
    Morfeld P; Borm P
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2007 Aug; 58(6):407; author reply 409. PubMed ID: 17560773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical analytical methods for comparing the incidence of tumors to the historical control data.
    Kobayashi K; Inoue H
    J Toxicol Sci; 1994 Feb; 19(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8207758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regression analysis of multivariate interval-censored failure time data with application to tumorigenicity experiments.
    Tong X; Chen MH; Sun J
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):364-74. PubMed ID: 18435503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of false negative rates from a trend test alone and from a trend test jointly with a control-high groups pairwise test in the determination of the carcinogenicity of new drugs.
    Lin KK; Rahman MA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):128-142. PubMed ID: 29781779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the use of historical control data for trend test in carcinogenicity studies.
    Sun J
    Biometrics; 1999 Dec; 55(4):1273-6. PubMed ID: 11315082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interpretation of equivocal or marginal animal carcinogenicity tests.
    Squire RA
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 1989 Dec; 5(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 2627673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Sanitary and toxicological assessment of anticoagulant rodenticides].
    Berezovskiĭ OI; Zaeva GI; Mal'tseva MM
    Gig Sanit; 2000; (3):62-6. PubMed ID: 10900803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lack of chronic toxicity or carcinogenicity of dietary N-acetylglucosamine in F344 rats.
    Takahashi M; Inoue K; Yoshida M; Morikawa T; Shibutani M; Nishikawa A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Feb; 47(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 19103248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Total error in experiments].
    Wuppermann D
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1973 Jul; 80(13):304-7 contd. PubMed ID: 4582071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Letter to the editor.
    Rubio FJ; Pérez-Elizalde S
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):736-8. PubMed ID: 19655311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of chloroethane toxicity and carcinogenicity including a comparison with bromoethane.
    Holder JW
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2008 Nov; 24(10):655-75. PubMed ID: 19141570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the cancer potential of methanol.
    Cruzan G
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(4):347-63. PubMed ID: 19514918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical evaluation of the in vivo micronucleus assay.
    Hothorn LA; Gerhard D
    Arch Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 83(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 19066853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety assessment of dietary administered paprika color in combined chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies using F344 rats.
    Inoue T; Umemura T; Maeda M; Ishii Y; Okamura T; Tasaki M; Nishikawa A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2689-93. PubMed ID: 18539379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The transgenic mouse assay as an alternative test method for regulatory carcinogenicity studies--implications for REACH.
    Wells MY; Williams ES
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 53(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 19126422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.