These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18065089)

  • 1. Futile debate on assessment of field dependence-independence.
    Tinajero C; Páramo MF; Guisande A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Oct; 105(2):654-6. PubMed ID: 18065089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who sees trees before forest? The obsessive-compulsive style of visual attention.
    Yovel I; Revelle W; Mineka S
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 15686578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's embedded figures test and matching familiar figures test-20: factorial structure for boys and girls from 6 to 11 years old.
    Amador-Campos JA; Kirchner-Nebot T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Dec; 93(3):709-12. PubMed ID: 11806591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlations among scores on measures of field dependence-independence cognitive style, cognitive ability, and sustained attention.
    Amador-Campos JA; Kirchner-Nebot T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Feb; 88(1):236-9. PubMed ID: 10214649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Field-dependent-independent cognitive style in solving dynamics problems.
    Wang LJ; Wang X; Ren MZ
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):867-80. PubMed ID: 12841460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractors interfere with numerical estimation in Chinese college students as a function of field-dependent or field-independent cognitive style.
    Xu J; Si JW; Zhang W
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Jun; 108(3):825-42. PubMed ID: 21879630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships among defensive styles, cognitive styles, processing styles, and attentional styles of normal adolescents.
    Perlman MD; Kaufman AS
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Oct; 67(2):563-78. PubMed ID: 2263710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-regulated learning in female students with different cognitive styles: an exploratory study.
    Tinajero C; Castelo AM; Adelina Guisande M; Fernanda Páramo M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Aug; 111(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 21058583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field dependence/independence and performance in school: an argument against neutrality of cognitive style.
    Páramo MF; Tinajero C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1079-87. PubMed ID: 2399082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationships among gender, cognitive style, academic major, and performance on the Piaget water-level task.
    Hammer RE; Hoffer N; King WL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 1):771-8. PubMed ID: 7567394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality and cognitive-style profile of antisocial and prosocial adolescents: a brief report.
    Lipperman-Kreda S; Glicksohn J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Oct; 54(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 19520900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of discrimination training on reading improvement among adults.
    Patti P; Kose G; Duncan J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Dec; 65(3):723-8. PubMed ID: 3438117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual figure-ground and perceptual stability.
    Zusne L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Oct; 77(2):564-6. PubMed ID: 8247680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the association of field dependence-independence with personality, learning style, and social-political attitudes among adolescents.
    DeBell M; Crystal DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):819-26. PubMed ID: 16491684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 15903116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field dependence and verbalized strategies on the portable rod-and-frame test by depressed outpatients and normal controls.
    Calamari E; Pini M; Puleggio A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 2):1221-9. PubMed ID: 11219664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociation of processing time and awareness by the inattentional blindness paradigm.
    Lo SY; Yeh SL
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1169-80. PubMed ID: 18467128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of field-dependent and field-independent subjects on a rod and frame discrimination task.
    Byrd GR; Paige SM; Guyot GW; Heck V
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1089-92. PubMed ID: 2399084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age, cognitive style, and traffic signs.
    Lambert LD; Fleury M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Apr; 78(2):611-24. PubMed ID: 8022689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning.
    Pacton S; Perruchet P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 18194056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.