62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18065277)
1. Comparison of One-Person Technique and Two-Person Technique for Colonoscope Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Shin H; Choe JW; Kim SY; Hyun JJ; Jung SW; Jung YK; Koo JS; Yim HJ
J Clin Med; 2024 May; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 38892851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Low Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) False Negative Rate for Polyps Excluding Reader Error.
Semenov S; Costigan C; Ismail MS; McNamara D
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36611348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing polyp detection: technological advances in colonoscopy imaging.
Lee A; Tutticci N
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021; 6():61. PubMed ID: 34805583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of cecum time-location in a colonoscopy video by deep learning analysis of colonoscope movement.
Cho M; Kim JH; Hong KS; Kim JS; Kong HJ; Kim S
PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7256. PubMed ID: 31392088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement of arthroscopic surgical performance using a new wide-angle arthroscope in the surgical training.
Kwak JM; Kholinne E; Gandhi M; Adikrishna A; Hong H; Sun Y; Koh KH; Jeon IH
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0203578. PubMed ID: 30856176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Tariq H; Kamal MU; Sapkota B; ElShikh F; Pirzada UA; Pullela N; Azam S; Zhang A; Baiomi A; Abbas H; Makker J; Balar B; Ihimoyan A; Daniel M; Dev A
BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2019; 6(1):e000254. PubMed ID: 30740233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Dimensionless Squared Jerk: An Objective Parameter That Improves Assessment of Hand Motion Analysis during Simulated Shoulder Arthroscopy.
Kholinne E; Gandhi MJ; Adikrishna A; Hong H; Kim H; Hong J; Jeon IH
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():7816160. PubMed ID: 30105247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of pre-resection endoscopic examination time on the rate of synchronous gastric neoplasms missed during endoscopic treatment.
Lee HH; Park JM; Lim CH; Kim JS; Cho YK; Choi MG
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):3952-3960. PubMed ID: 28271265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?
Thirumurthi S; Ross WA; Raju GS
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2016 Jul; 18(7):38. PubMed ID: 27255334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new wide-angle arthroscopic system: a comparative study with a conventional 30° arthroscopic system.
Jung K; Kang DJ; Kekatpure AL; Adikrishna A; Hong J; Jeon IH
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 May; 24(5):1722-9. PubMed ID: 26745963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short turn radius colonoscope in an anatomical model: retroflexed withdrawal and detection of hidden polyps.
McGill SK; Kothari S; Friedland S; Chen A; Park WG; Banerjee S
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 21(2):593-9. PubMed ID: 25593483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.
Rex DK; Schoenfeld PS; Cohen J; Pike IM; Adler DG; Fennerty MB; Lieb JG; Park WG; Rizk MK; Sawhney MS; Shaheen NJ; Wani S; Weinberg DS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 110(1):72-90. PubMed ID: 25448873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy
Schoenfeld PS; Cohen J
Tech Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 15(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 24098071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.
Raju GS; Vadyala V; Slack R; Krishna SG; Ross WA; Lynch PM; Bresalier RS; Hawk E; Stroehlein JR
Cancer Med; 2013 Jun; 2(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 23930215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of advances in instrumentation and techniques of colonoscopy from 1988 to 2008 on inpatient colonoscopy performance at a high volume endoscopy unit in the United States: significantly shorter procedure time, higher completion rate, performance on sicker inpatients, and near disappearance of flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Cappell MS; Abboud R
Dig Dis Sci; 2010 Dec; 55(12):3521-9. PubMed ID: 20401535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.
Deenadayalu VP; Chadalawada V; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2138-42. PubMed ID: 15554993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
