126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1806572)
1. Predictive value of classical and automated sperm analysis for in-vitro fertilization.
Barlow P; Delvigne A; Van Dromme J; Van Hoeck J; Vandenbosch K; Leroy F
Hum Reprod; 1991 Sep; 6(8):1119-24. PubMed ID: 1806572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program.
Joshi N; Kodwany G; Balaiah D; Parikh M; Parikh F
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8673156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) and fertilization rates in vitro.
Hirano Y; Shibahara H; Obara H; Suzuki T; Takamizawa S; Yamaguchi C; Tsunoda H; Sato I
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2001 Apr; 18(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11432113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between sperm motility assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer and fertilization rates in vitro.
Liu DY; Clarke GN; Baker HW
J Androl; 1991; 12(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 1917688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human sperm movement assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer and in vitro fertilization.
Mak C; van Kooij RJ; Eimers JM; te Velde ER
Andrologia; 1994; 26(6):323-9. PubMed ID: 7872506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sperm recovery and survival: two tests that predict in vitro fertilization outcome.
Stovall DW; Guzick DS; Berga SL; Krasnow JS; Zeleznik AJ
Fertil Steril; 1994 Dec; 62(6):1244-9. PubMed ID: 7957992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between sperm morphology using strict criteria in original semen and swim-up inseminate and human in vitro fertilization.
Yang YS; Chen SU; Ho HN; Chen HF; Chao KH; Lin HR; Huang SC; Lee TY
Arch Androl; 1995; 34(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 7786087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vitro fertilization in cases with severe sperm defect: use of a swim-across technique and medium supplemented with follicular fluid.
Giorgetti C; Hans E; Spach JL; Auquier P; Roulier R
Hum Reprod; 1992 Sep; 7(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 1400937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study on the predictive value of normal sperm morphology as evaluated by computer (IVOS).
Kruger TF; Lacquet FA; Sarmiento CA; Menkveld R; Ozgür K; Lombard CJ; Franken DR
Fertil Steril; 1996 Aug; 66(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 8690118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Poor in vitro fertilization outcome with semen yielding low sperm density "swim-ups" is not because of altered sperm motion parameters.
Thanki KH; Gagliardi CL; Schmidt CL
Fertil Steril; 1992 Oct; 58(4):770-5. PubMed ID: 1426324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the fertilizing potential of human sperm suspensions in vitro: importance of sperm morphology and leukocyte contamination.
Sukcharoen N; Keith J; Irvine DS; Aitken RJ
Fertil Steril; 1995 Jun; 63(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 7538475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sperm velocity and morphology, female characteristics, and the hypo-osmotic swelling test as predictors of fertilization potential: experience from the IVF model.
Sallam HN; Ezzeldin F; Sallam A; Agameya AF; Farrag A
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2003; 48(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 12779295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive value of morphologically normal sperm concentration in the medium for in-vitro fertilization.
Enginsu ME; Dumoulin JC; Pieters MH; Evers JL; Geraedts JP
Int J Androl; 1993 Apr; 16(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 8514422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does computerized image analysis of sperm movement enhance the predictive value of semen analysis for in-vitro fertilization results?
Grunert JH; de Geyter C; Bordt J; Schneider HP; Nieschlag E
Int J Androl; 1989 Oct; 12(5):329-38. PubMed ID: 2592121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced methods for evaluation of sperm quality.
Yavetz H; Hauser R; Yogev L; Botchan A; Lessing JB; Homonnai ZT; Paz G
Andrologia; 1995; 27(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 7755187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between morphology and motion characteristics of human spermatozoa in semen and in the swim-up sperm fractions.
Oehninger S; Acosta R; Morshedi M; Philput C; Swanson RJ; Acosta AA
J Androl; 1990; 11(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 2254178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of in vitro fertilization rates from semen variables.
Duncan WW; Glew MJ; Wang XJ; Flaherty SP; Matthews CD
Fertil Steril; 1993 Jun; 59(6):1233-8. PubMed ID: 8495771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The effect of selected sperm characteristics on their fertilizing potential during IVF procedures].
Jedrzejczak P; Taszarek-Hauke G; Derwich K; Depa M; Pawelczyk L
Ginekol Pol; 2004 Dec; 75(12):946-55. PubMed ID: 15751216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a cut-off value for sperm motility after different hours of incubation to select the suitable reproductive technology (IVF or ICSI).
Zollner U; Martin S; Liebermann J; Steck T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Apr; 78(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 10203301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
