These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1806593)

  • 1. Survival predictions of four types of dental restorative materials.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA; Leppard PI
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 1806593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictions of restoration deterioration.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA; Leppard PI
    J Dent; 1992 Aug; 20(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 1430511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival predictions of amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA; Leppard PI
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 1806592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials.
    Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):218-28. PubMed ID: 9863442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental materials: 1995 literature review.
    Lloyd CH; Scrimgeour SN; Brown D; Clarke RL; Curtis RV; Hatton PV; Ireland AJ; McCabe JF; Nicholson JW; Setcos JC; Sherriff M; van Noort R; Watts DC; Whitters CJ; Wood D
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):173-208. PubMed ID: 9175346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bond strength measurements of fissure sealant to glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cement.
    Gray GB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 7920406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of occlusal glass ionomer, resin, and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC; White IL
    J Dent; 1990 Oct; 18(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 2127419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT.
    Chen X; Cuijpers V; Fan M; Frencken JE
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 20580767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluoride exchange from glass ionomer preventive resin restorations.
    Kupietzky A; Houpt M; Mellberg J; Shey Z
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7831138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of amalgam restoration longevity.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA; Leppard PI; Dawson AS
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 2016424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changing provision of restorative services in Australia.
    Spencer AJ; Brennan DS; Szuster FS
    J Dent; 1994 Jun; 22(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 8027455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examination of a resin-modified glass-ionomer material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Johnson LM; Duke ES; Camm J; Hermesch CB; Buikema DJ
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Dec; 26(12):879-83. PubMed ID: 8596819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency of protective sealants for glass ionomer cements.
    Haddad D; Mount GJ; Makinson OF
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):286-8. PubMed ID: 1299260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.