These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18066409)

  • 21. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
    Jones AW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
    Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N
    JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Medical journals in the Republic of Macedonia after the Second World War.
    Polenakovic M; Danevska L
    Prilozi; 2011; 32(2):11-31. PubMed ID: 22286612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developing and evaluating criteria to help reviewers of biomedical informatics manuscripts.
    Ammenwerth E; Wolff AC; Knaup P; Ulmer H; Skonetzki S; van Bemmel JH; McCray AT; Haux R; Kulikowski C
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(5):512-4. PubMed ID: 12807814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How to review a manuscript.
    Alam M
    Dermatol Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):883-8. PubMed ID: 26218722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acceptance or decline of requests to review manuscripts: A gender-based approach from a public health journal.
    Felícitas Domínguez-Berjón M; Godoy P; Ruano-Ravina A; Negrín MÁ; Vives-Cases C; Álvarez-Dardet C; Bermúdez-Tamayo C; López MJ; Pérez G; Borrell C
    Account Res; 2018; 25(2):94-108. PubMed ID: 29390914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality of medical journals with special reference to the Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal.
    Aly AM
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S18-20. PubMed ID: 14968186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Citius, altius, fortius in 2001.
    Misak A
    Croat Med J; 2001 Feb; 42(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 11172648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peer review in journals indexed in Index Medicus.
    Colaianni LA
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 8015132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving Bridging from Informatics Practice to Theory.
    Lehmann CU; Gundlapalli AV
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(6):540-5. PubMed ID: 26577504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.
    Herron DM
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Aug; 26(8):2275-80. PubMed ID: 22350231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The discipline and literature of general practice.
    Gray DP; Wright A; O'Dowd T; Dunn G; Hannay D; King M; Kinmonth AL; Taylor R; Waine C; Wilmot J
    Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Mar; 47(416):139-43. PubMed ID: 9167316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
    Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2018 Dec; 35(4):263-264. PubMed ID: 30499172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?
    Gilbert JR; Williams ES; Lundberg GD
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 8015126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Improving the editing of medical journals and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)].
    Reyes H; Kauffmann R; Andresen M
    Rev Med Chil; 1997 Nov; 125(11):1289-91. PubMed ID: 9609048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Croatian Medical Journal at the turn of the millennium.
    Marusić M; Martinic Blase E; Marusić A
    Croat Med J; 2000 Mar; 41(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 10810164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How does the peer review process influence AANA journal article readability?
    Biddle C; Aker J
    AANA J; 1996 Feb; 64(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 8928603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.