These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18066409)

  • 41. Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
    Frontera WR; Grimby G; Basford J; Müller D; Ring H
    J Rehabil Med; 2008 Mar; 40(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 18292915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals.
    Schroter S; Price A; Flemyng E; Demaine A; Elliot J; Harmston RR; Richards T; Staniszewska S; Stephens R
    BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e023357. PubMed ID: 30185581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Improving your journal article using feedback from peer review.
    Price B
    Nurs Stand; 2014 Sep; 29(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 25249122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. World of wordcraft: on scientific editing.
    Martin A
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Feb; 38(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 24430591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
    Bayne SC; McGivney GP; Mazer SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.
    Tite L; Schroter S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jan; 61(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 17183008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pitfalls and successes of peer review in neurosurgery.
    Laws ER; Pait TG; Jane JA
    J Neurosurg; 1997 Dec; 87(6):972-6. PubMed ID: 9384415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
    Bugiardini R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The JAMIA Student Editorial Board: peer review education in biomedical informatics.
    Johnson KB; Miller RA
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 14758815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Translational research in medical informatics or from theory to practice. A call for an applied informatics journal.
    Lehmann CU; Altuwaijri MM; Li YC; Ball MJ; Haux R
    Methods Inf Med; 2008; 47(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18213421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. New Czech Postgraduate Doctoral Program in Biomedical Informatics.
    Zvarova J; Svacina S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 90():766-9. PubMed ID: 15460795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
    Newton DP
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals.
    Luty J; Arokiadass SM; Easow JM; Anapreddy JR
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Mar; 35(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 19251974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [The new start,the new pursuit].
    Zhang ZY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Feb; 13(1):1. PubMed ID: 15031748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The relevance of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) for medical publishing and research].
    Reyes HB
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jan; 142(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 24861118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
    Biddle C
    AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Improvement and decision-making process of an article].
    Matías-Guiu J; García Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2009; 24(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 19798600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.