These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18067138)

  • 21. Predictive power of motor unit potential parameters in anal sphincter electromyography.
    Podnar S; Mrkaić M
    Muscle Nerve; 2002 Sep; 26(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 12210369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Motor unit changes in thoracic paraspinal muscles in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
    de Carvalho M; Pinto S; Swash M
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Jan; 39(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 19086064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Template-operated MUP analysis is not accurate in the diagnosis of myopathic or neuropathic changes in the diaphragm.
    Leonardis L; Podnar S
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2017 Dec; 47(5-6):405-412. PubMed ID: 28844760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Usefulness of an increase in size of motor unit potential sample.
    Podnar S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1683-8. PubMed ID: 15203070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter: a comparison of concentric needle and surface electrodes.
    Brostrom S; Jennum P; Lose G
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 12579629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distribution of motor unit potential velocities in short static and prolonged dynamic contractions at low forces: use of the within-subject's skewness and standard deviation variables.
    Klaver-Król EG; Henriquez NR; Oosterloo SJ; Klaver P; Bos JM; Zwarts MJ
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2007 Nov; 101(5):647-58. PubMed ID: 17874124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of small motor unit potentials on the motor unit number estimate.
    van Dijk JP; Zwarts MJ; Schelhaas HJ; Stegeman DF
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Jul; 38(1):887-92. PubMed ID: 18508351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Concomitant responses of upper airway stabilizing muscles to transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal men.
    Sériès F; Wang W; Mélot C; Similowski T
    Exp Physiol; 2008 Apr; 93(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 18223029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Motor unit number estimation using high-density surface electromyography.
    van Dijk JP; Blok JH; Lapatki BG; van Schaik IN; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 119(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18037342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
    Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Aging effects on motor units in the human thyroarytenoid muscle.
    Takeda N; Thomas GR; Ludlow CL
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Jun; 110(6):1018-25. PubMed ID: 10852524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New display of the timing and firing frequency of single motor units.
    Saboisky JP; Butler JE; Walsh LD; Gandevia SC
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 May; 162(1-2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17336391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Progressive teflon denudation of the monopolar needle: effects on motor unit potential parameters.
    Chu J; Chan RC; Bruyninckx F
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Jan; 68(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 3800622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Standardization of anal sphincter electromyography: utility of motor unit potential parameters.
    Podnar S; Vodusek DB
    Muscle Nerve; 2001 Jul; 24(7):946-51. PubMed ID: 11410923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of the EMG amplifier filter settings on the motor unit action potential parameters recorded with concentric and monopolar needles.
    Chu J; Chan RC; Bruyninckx F
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 26(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 3830043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Criteria for neuropathic abnormality in quantitative anal sphincter electromyography.
    Podnar S
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 Nov; 30(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 15389723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of quantitative techniques in anal sphincter electromyography.
    Podnar S; Vodusek DB; Stålberg E
    Muscle Nerve; 2002 Jan; 25(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 11754189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multi-MUP analysis of laryngeal muscles.
    Koivu MK; Jääskeläinen SK; Falck BB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jul; 113(7):1077-81. PubMed ID: 12088703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian characterization of external anal sphincter muscles using quantitative electromyography.
    Pino LJ; Stashuk DW; Podnar S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2266-73. PubMed ID: 18760963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Standardisation of anal sphincter EMG: high and low threshold motor units.
    Podnar S; Vodusek DB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Aug; 110(8):1488-91. PubMed ID: 10454288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.