BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1084 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18068452)

  • 1. Efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter implantation after failed bone-anchored male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence.
    Fisher MB; Aggarwal N; Vuruskan H; Singla AK
    Urology; 2007 Nov; 70(5):942-4. PubMed ID: 18068452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of outcomes for adjustable bulbourethral male sling and artificial urinary sphincter after previous artificial urinary sphincter erosion.
    Tuygun C; Imamoglu A; Gucuk A; Goktug G; Demirel F
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 19376562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bone anchor suburethral synthetic sling for iatrogenic male incontinence: critical evaluation at a mean 3-year followup.
    Giberti C; Gallo F; Schenone M; Cortese P; Ninotta G
    J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2204-8. PubMed ID: 19296976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence--what do patients choose?
    Kumar A; Litt ER; Ballert KN; Nitti VW
    J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1231-5. PubMed ID: 19152937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery.
    Guimarães M; Oliveira R; Pinto R; Soares A; Maia E; Botelho F; Sousa T; Pina F; Dinis P; Cruz F
    BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):500-4. PubMed ID: 18782301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective and quality-of-life outcomes with bone-anchored male bulbourethral sling.
    Gallagher BL; Dwyer NT; Gaynor-Krupnick DM; Latini JM; Kreder KJ
    Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1090-4. PubMed ID: 17572193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence.
    Carmel M; Hage B; Hanna S; Schmutz G; Tu le M
    BJU Int; 2010 Oct; 106(7):1012-6. PubMed ID: 20201839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The male perineal sling: intermediate-term results.
    Comiter CV
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 16167352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Artificial sphincter in severe urinary incontinence: 9 years of experience].
    Batista Miranda JE; Arañó Bertrán P; Errando Smet C
    Arch Esp Urol; 2000 Jun; 53(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 10961004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Salvage therapy with artificial urinary sphincter after Advance™ male sling failure for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a first clinical experience].
    Abdou A; Cornu JN; Sèbe P; Ciofu C; Peyrat L; Cussenot O; Haab F
    Prog Urol; 2012 Oct; 22(11):650-6. PubMed ID: 22999090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Treatment of postoperative male urinary incontinence by bone-anchored male sling].
    Mouracade P; Wagner B; Charles T; Lang H; Jacqmin D; Saussine C
    Prog Urol; 2008 Jun; 18(6):390-4. PubMed ID: 18558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: 24-month followup with questionnaire based assessment.
    Ullrich NF; Comiter CV
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):207-9. PubMed ID: 15201775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continence and quality of life assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
    Gnessin E; Livne PM; Baniel J; Gillon G
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Oct; 6(10):592-4. PubMed ID: 15473584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of bone-anchored male sling and collagen implant for the treatment of male incontinence.
    Onur R; Singla A
    Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1207-11. PubMed ID: 16984554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence?
    Thiel DD; Young PR; Broderick GA; Heckman MG; Wehle MJ; Igel TC; Petrou SP
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 17320671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup.
    Haab F; Trockman BA; Zimmern PE; Leach GE
    J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):435-9. PubMed ID: 9224318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mid-term outcome after bulbourethral composite suspension for postprostatectomy incontinence.
    John H; Blick N
    Urology; 2008 Jun; 71(6):1191-5. PubMed ID: 18538695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.
    O'Connor RC; Lyon MB; Guralnick ML; Bales GT
    Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 18242372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: mean followup of 18 months.
    Castle EP; Andrews PE; Itano N; Novicki DE; Swanson SK; Ferrigni RG
    J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1657-60. PubMed ID: 15821530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine.
    Lai HH; Hsu EI; Teh BS; Butler EB; Boone TB
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1021-5. PubMed ID: 17296403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.