These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18068590)

  • 1. Practice-based comparison of direct and indirect bonding.
    Deahl ST; Salome N; Hatch JP; Rugh JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):738-42. PubMed ID: 18068590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strength analysis of custom base variables in indirect bonding techniques.
    Thompson MA; Drummond JL; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e15-20. PubMed ID: 18174062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Six-month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self-etching primer.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Turk T; Cakmak F
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 18216373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indirect laminate veneers as an indirect bonding method.
    Miyazawa K; Miwa H; Goto S; Kondo T
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 15633376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentaries. A clinical comparison of bracket bond failures in association with direct and indirect bonding.
    Benson P
    J Orthod; 2006 Sep; 33(3):185. PubMed ID: 16926311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets.
    Hamilton R; Goonewardene MS; Murray K
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 19113074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival analysis with clustered observations of orthodontic brackets.
    Petracci E; Farella M; Galeone C; Albano A; Ferraroni M; Decarli A
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(28):3483-91. PubMed ID: 19902496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of bracket positioning in the indirect bonding technique.
    Nichols DA; Gardner G; Carballeyra AD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):770-6. PubMed ID: 24182593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth.
    Endo T; Ozoe R; Shinkai K; Shimomura J; Katoh Y; Shimooka S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18675200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vivo study to compare a plasma arc light and a conventional quartz halogen curing light in orthodontic bonding.
    Pettemerides AP; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 26(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 15650065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indirect bonding--a new transfer method.
    Wendl B; Droschl H; Muchitsch P
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 18276930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does microetching enamel reduce bracket failure when indirect bonding mandibular posterior teeth?
    Miles PG
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 May; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18649556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure rate of brackets bonded with antimicrobial and fluoride-releasing, self-etching primer and the effect on prevention of enamel demineralization.
    Paschos E; Kurochkina N; Huth KC; Hansson CS; Rudzki-Janson I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 19409344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.
    Adanir N; Türkkahraman H; Yalçin Güngör A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 19073952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on the bond failure rate of orthodontic brackets in vivo.
    Varlik SK; Demirbaş E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):144.e1-4; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 19201317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indirect bonding technique.
    Kothari A
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 17190232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pilot study for evaluation of bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel using a new impact test machine.
    Hendry RE; Gilgrass T; Chung L; MacPherson R; Yang TH; Reuben RL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():103-11. PubMed ID: 18376018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indirect bonding of brackets: don't wait another day!
    Pellan P
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2007; 18(3):11-7. PubMed ID: 17958261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.