340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18068604)
41. Cephalometry with a video display computer.
Gatti AM; Amadori MP
Med Prog Technol; 1986; 11(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 3702829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Detecting computer-enhanced dentistry.
Neiburger EJ; Frandzel YL
J Mass Dent Soc; 2008; 57(2):30-2. PubMed ID: 18705212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Assessment of manipulation accuracy of digitized occlusal radiographic images--sub and over exposure.
Maschtakow PS; Moraes ME; Soares MG; Santos LR; Moraes LC; Castilho JC
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2009; 22(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19839487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Three-dimensional facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics: a correlation study.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Puleo A; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 9456609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The digital revolution, images and X-rays.
Emmott LF
N Y State Dent J; 2005 Jan; 71(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15768910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images.
Turner PJ; Weerakone S
J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 11504900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs.
Erkan M; Gurel HG; Nur M; Demirel B
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 21502380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Lateral cephalometric norms for adolescent Kuwaitis: soft tissue measurements.
Al-Azemi R; Al-Jame B; Artun J
Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 18408390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms.
Hagemann K; Vollmer D; Niegel T; Ehmer U; Reuter I
J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10783561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Direct digital lateral cephalometry: the effects of JPEG compression on image quality.
Wenger NA; Tewson DH; McDonald F
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 16290207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Digital and manual cephalometric analysis.
Thurzo A; Javorka V; Stanko P; Lysy J; Suchancova B; Lehotska V; Valkovic L; Makovnik M
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 20429323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms.
Borrie F; Thomson D; McIntyre GT
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21300728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography.
Tsang KH; Cooke MS
Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10191573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Are orthodontic landmarks and variables in digital cephalometric radiography taken in fixed and natural head positions reliable?
Giannopoulou MA; Kondylidou-Sidira AC; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 31495758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms.
Macrì V; Wenzel A
Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 8500539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Conversion of teaching file cases from film to digital format: a comparison between use of a diagnostic-quality digitizer and use of a flatbed scanner with transparency adapter.
Bassignani MJ; Bubash-Faust L; Ciambotti J; Moran R; McIlhenny J
Acad Radiol; 2003 May; 10(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 12755543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
