323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18068878)
1. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty?
Varini E; Cristofolini L; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 18068878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Device to measure intra-operatively the primary stability of cementless hip stems.
Cristofolini L; Varini E; Pelgreffi I; Cappello A; Toni A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jun; 28(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16144768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: a statistical analysis.
Viceconti M; Brusi G; Pancanti A; Cristofolini L
J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1169-79. PubMed ID: 15927191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation.
Nogler M; Polikeit A; Wimmer C; Brückner A; Ferguson SJ; Krismer M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 14967574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs].
Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-operative evaluation of cementless hip implant stability: a prototype device based on vibration analysis.
Lannocca M; Varini E; Cappello A; Cristofolini L; Bialoblocka E
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Oct; 29(8):886-94. PubMed ID: 17101289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of the primary stability of a cementless hip stem to its position and orientation.
Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Taddei F; Viceconti M
Artif Organs; 2008 Jul; 32(7):555-60. PubMed ID: 18638310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation].
Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How close does an uncemented hip stem match the final rasp position?
Barink M; Meijers H; Spruit M; Fankhauser C; Verdonschot N
Acta Orthop Belg; 2004 Dec; 70(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 15669452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem.
Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robust design for acetabular cup stability accounting for patient and surgical variability.
Ong KL; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031001. PubMed ID: 18532850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cementless stem fixation and primary stability under physiological-like loads in vitro.
Heller MO; Kassi JP; Perka C; Duda GN
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Dec; 50(12):394-9. PubMed ID: 16429942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting the subject-specific primary stability of cementless implants during pre-operative planning: preliminary validation of subject-specific finite-element models.
Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Varini E; Viceconti M
J Biomech; 2007; 40(11):2552-8. PubMed ID: 17229427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design.
Bieger R; Ignatius A; Decking R; Claes L; Reichel H; Dürselen L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 21889243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.
Sakai R; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 16701927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary stability of custom and anatomical uncemented femoral stems: a method for three-dimensional in vitro measurement of implant stability.
Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Romundstad P; Aamodt A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 May; 25(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 20129726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
