224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18068924)
1. Thin-section CT of lung without ECG gating: 64-detector row CT can markedly reduce cardiac motion artifact which can simulate lung lesions.
Yanagawa M; Tomiyama N; Sumikawa H; Inoue A; Daimon T; Honda O; Mihara N; Johkoh T; Nakamura H
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 18068924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrocardiographically gated thin-section CT of the lung.
Schoepf UJ; Becker CR; Bruening RD; Helmberger T; Staebler A; Leimeister P; Reiser MF
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):649-54. PubMed ID: 10478227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal cardiac phase for coronary artery calcium scoring on single-source 64-MDCT scanner: least interscan variability and least motion artifacts.
Matsuura N; Horiguchi J; Yamamoto H; Hirai N; Tonda T; Kohno N; Ito K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1561-8. PubMed ID: 18492907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of artifacts on coronal reformation and axial CT pulmonary angiography images using single-detector and 4- and 8-detector multidetector-row helical CT scanners.
Boiselle PM; Hasegawa I; Nishino M; Raptopoulos V; Hatabu H
Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):602-7. PubMed ID: 15866133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion artifact on high-resolution CT images of pediatric patients: comparison of volumetric and axial CT methods.
Bastos Md; Lee EY; Strauss KJ; Zurakowski D; Tracy DA; Boiselle PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1414-8. PubMed ID: 19843761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality from high-resolution CT of the lung: comparison of axial scans and of sections reconstructed from volumetric data acquired using MDCT.
Studler U; Gluecker T; Bongartz G; Roth J; Steinbrich W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Sep; 185(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 16120906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lung image quality with 320-row wide-volume CT scans: the effect of prospective ECG-gating and comparisons with 64-row helical CT scans.
Yamashiro T; Miyara T; Takahashi M; Kikuyama A; Kamiya H; Koyama H; Ohno Y; Moriya H; Matsuki M; Tanaka Y; Noma S; Murayama S;
Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):380-8. PubMed ID: 22222025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-pitch computed tomography of the lung in pediatric patients: an intraindividual comparison of image quality and radiation dose to conventional 64-MDCT.
Tsiflikas I; Thomas C; Ketelsen D; Seitz G; Warmann S; Claussen CD; Schäfer JF
Rofo; 2014 Jun; 186(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 24756428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motion artifacts on coronary CT angiography images in patients with a pericardial effusion.
Kondo T; Takamura K; Fujimoto S; Takase S; Sekine T; Matsutani H; Rybicki FJ; Kumamaru KK
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24238642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of respiratory motion artifact from craniocaudal versus caudocranial scanning with 64-MDCT pulmonary angiography.
Wu C; Sodickson A; Cai T; Levit NA; Steigner ML; Rybicki FJ; Ledbetter SM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 20566810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images.
Bajpai V; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection.
Giesler T; Baum U; Ropers D; Ulzheimer S; Wenkel E; Mennicke M; Bautz W; Kalender WA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):911-6. PubMed ID: 12239036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose modulated retrospective ECG-gated versus non-gated 64-row CT angiography of the aorta at the same radiation dose: comparison of motion artifacts, diagnostic confidence and signal-to-noise-ratios.
Schernthaner RE; Stadler A; Beitzke D; Homolka P; Weber M; Lammer J; Czerny M; Loewe C
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e585-90. PubMed ID: 21820829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-detector row CT artifacts that mimic disease.
Cody DD; Stevens DM; Ginsberg LE
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):756-61. PubMed ID: 16055698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thin-section multiplanar reformats from multidetector-row CT data: utility for assessment of regional tumor extent in non-small cell lung cancer.
Higashino T; Ohno Y; Takenaka D; Watanabe H; Nogami M; Ohbayashi C; Yoshimura M; Satouchi M; Nishimura Y; Fujii M; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Oct; 56(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 16168264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thin-section CT of the lung: does electrocardiographic triggering influence diagnosis?
Boehm T; Willmann JK; Hilfiker PR; Weishaupt D; Seifert B; Crook DW; Marincek B; Wildermuth S
Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):483-91. PubMed ID: 14512510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronal reformations of the chest on 64-row multi-detector row CT: evaluation of image quality in comparison with 16-, 8- and 4-row multi-detector row CT.
Nishino M; Kubo T; Kataoka ML; Raptopoulos V; Hatabu H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 16567075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality of volume rendering of the bronchial tree: Kymogram-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated and non-gated multi-row detector CT.
Boehm T; Alkadhi H; Sennst DA; Schertler T; Kachelriess M; Kalender W; Marincek B; Wildermuth S
Acad Radiol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 15721594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-resolution computed tomography with single-slice computed tomography and 16-channel multidetector computed tomography: a comparison regarding visibility and motion artifacts.
Vikgren J; Båth M; Johnsson AA; Flinck A; Milde H; Thilander-Klang A; Kheddache S
Acta Radiol; 2007 Nov; 48(9):956-61. PubMed ID: 17957508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated cardiac phase selection with 64-MDCT coronary angiography.
Joemai RM; Geleijns J; Veldkamp WJ; de Roos A; Kroft LJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):1690-7. PubMed ID: 19020237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
