295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18069256)
1. [Classification, staging and prognostic indices for multiple myeloma].
Hotta T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2161-6. PubMed ID: 18069256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.
International Myeloma Working Group
Br J Haematol; 2003 Jun; 121(5):749-57. PubMed ID: 12780789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Prognositic factors in multiple myeloma].
Nagura E
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2351-6. PubMed ID: 18069282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. International Staging System required standardization of biochemical laboratory testing in multiple myeloma.
Tichý M; Maisnar V; Palicka V; Friedecký B; Vávrová J; Novotná H; Cermáková Z; Dastych M; Cechák P; Vogtová D; Jarolímková E; Benáková H; Hachová L; Bezdícková D; Kouril F; Zábranská EA; Zenková J; Slabý P; Scudla V; Gregora E; Spicka I; Straub J; Schützova M; Hájek R
Neoplasma; 2006; 53(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 17167717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Prognostic analysis and assessment on the clinical staging systems of multiple myeloma--a report of 206 cases].
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Chen YB; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Hou J
Ai Zheng; 2006 Apr; 25(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 16613681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. International staging system for multiple myeloma.
Greipp PR; San Miguel J; Durie BG; Crowley JJ; Barlogie B; Bladé J; Boccadoro M; Child JA; Avet-Loiseau H; Kyle RA; Lahuerta JJ; Ludwig H; Morgan G; Powles R; Shimizu K; Shustik C; Sonneveld P; Tosi P; Turesson I; Westin J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(15):3412-20. PubMed ID: 15809451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of the international staging system of multiple myeloma and its comparison with the DS and IFM staging system in 122 Chinese patients].
Deng SH; Xu Y; Mai YJ; Wang YF; Zhao YZ; Zou DH; Qiu LG
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 29(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18843972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple myeloma staging based on the combination of beta-2-microglobulin and albumin: the role of albumin in the model.
Mihou D; Katodritou E; Zervas K
Hematology; 2007 Dec; 12(6):527-31. PubMed ID: 17852450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. International prognostic index (IPI)--a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy.
Scudla V; Zemanova M; Minarik J; Bacovsky J; Ordeltova M; Indrak K; Budikova M; Dusek L; Farbiakova V
Neoplasma; 2006; 53(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 16830053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic factors and staging systems of multiple myeloma:
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Chen YB; Hou J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(19):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17935664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study of 2 prognostic classification systems for myeloma and examination of the correlation between initial bone marrow plasmacytosis and prognosis. A propos of a homogeneous population of 50 patients followed from diagnosis to death].
Pesce A; Cassuto JP; Grisot C; Gratecos N; Bayle J; Viot G; Dujardin P
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1983; 25(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 6657481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple myeloma: new staging systems for diagnosis, prognosis and response evaluation.
Rajkumar SV; Buadi F
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol; 2007 Dec; 20(4):665-80. PubMed ID: 18070712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prognostic value of the new international staging system in multiple myeloma. Comparison with Durie-Salmon staging system].
Conté L G; Figueroa M G; Lois V V; Cabrera C ME; León R A; García L H; Rojas R H
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Jan; 136(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18483648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification and prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of relationship of survivals and responses to chemotherapy to immunological types, 20 single prognostic factors, 15 clinical staging systems, and 6 morphological classifications.
Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Collacciani A; Casale R; Natali G
Panminerva Med; 1991; 33(2):93-110. PubMed ID: 1923560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biochemical and immunological findings of multiple myeloma].
Asaoku H
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2256-60. PubMed ID: 18069270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system.
Durie BG
Eur J Cancer; 2006 Jul; 42(11):1539-43. PubMed ID: 16777405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Prognostic factors of multiple myeloma].
Paule B
Ann Med Interne (Paris); 1997; 148(8):534-41. PubMed ID: 9538400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stratification of multiple myeloma according to serum beta 2-microglobulin and serum albumin levels.
Scudla V; Budíková M; Fischerová E; Zadrazil J; Indrák K
Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med; 1991; 130():201-12. PubMed ID: 1838869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Staging multiple myeloma patients with active disease using serum levels of beta2m-free HLA class I heavy chain together with IgM or platelet count.
Perosa F; Minoia C; Favoino E; Prete M; Dammacco F
Blood Cells Mol Dis; 2009; 42(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 18996035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of criteria in staging in multiple myeloma.
Pennec Y; Mottier D; Youinou P; Asselain B; Miossec P; Le Goff P; Le Prise PY; Le Menn G
Haematologia (Budap); 1982; 15(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 7160667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
