These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18070376)

  • 1. Acquiescent responding in partially balanced multidimensional scales.
    Lorenzo-Seva U; Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):319-26. PubMed ID: 18070376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acquiescence as a source of bias and model and person misfit: a theoretical and empirical analysis.
    Ferrando PJ; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):427-48. PubMed ID: 19840493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20.
    Soto CJ; John OP; Gosling SD; Potter J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):718-37. PubMed ID: 18361680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do balanced scales assess bipolar constructs? The case of the STAI scales.
    Vautier S; Pohl S
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Jun; 21(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 19485673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Dyadic Adjustment Scale: clinical interest of a revision and validation of an abbreviated form].
    Antoine P; Christophe V; Nandrino JL
    Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18514149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Pain coping strategies: French adaptation of the coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ-F)].
    Irachabal S; Koleck M; Rascle N; Bruchon-Schweitzer M
    Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18514150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An examination of personality characteristics related to acquiescence.
    DiStefano C; Morgan GB; Motl RW
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 22677496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Loneliness Questionnaire-Short Version: an evaluation of reverse-worded and non-reverse-worded items via item response theory.
    Ebesutani C; Drescher CF; Reise SP; Heiden L; Hight TL; Damon JD; Young J
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 22404209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do respondents construe ambiguous response formats of affect items?
    Segura SL; Gonzalez-Roma V
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Nov; 85(5):956-68. PubMed ID: 14599257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of diagnostic measures based on latent class analysis: a step forward in response bias research.
    Thomas ML; Lanyon RI; Millsap RE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Jun; 21(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 19485677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidimensionality and bipolarity of a Spanish version of Warr's (1990) well-being measures.
    Cifre E; Salanova M
    J Psychol; 2002 Jan; 136(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 12022780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [KON-2006--Neurotic Personality Questionnaire].
    Aleksandrowicz JW; Klasa K; Sobański JA; Stolarska D
    Psychiatr Pol; 2007; 41(6):759-78. PubMed ID: 18540420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Pretest survey on the Chinese menopause rating scale].
    Wen ZH; Nie GN; Wang XY; Yang HY; Zhang CL; Wu DR; Wei SB; He JC; Lu S
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 29(10):985-8. PubMed ID: 19173878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adolescent coping scales: a critical psychometric review.
    Sveinbjornsdottir S; Thorsteinsson EB
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Dec; 49(6):533-48. PubMed ID: 18489531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The French adaptation of the STAXI-2, C.D. Spielberger's State-trait anger expression inventory].
    Borteyrou X; Bruchon-Schweitzer M; Spielberger CD
    Encephale; 2008 Jun; 34(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 18558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: let's learn from cows in the rain.
    van Sonderen E; Sanderman R; Coyne JC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68967. PubMed ID: 23935915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards a genetically validated new affective temperament scale: a delineation of the temperament phenotype of 5-HTTLPR using the TEMPS-A.
    Gonda X; Fountoulakis KN; Rihmer Z; Lazary J; Laszik A; Akiskal KK; Akiskal HS; Bagdy G
    J Affect Disord; 2009 Jan; 112(1-3):19-29. PubMed ID: 18455241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring drug urges by questionnaire: do not balance scales.
    Sweeney CT; Pillitteri JL; Kozlowski LT
    Addict Behav; 1996; 21(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8730521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting random, partially random, and nonrandom Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 protocols.
    Pinsoneault TB
    Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 17371131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.