260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18071076)
1. Which hospitals have significantly better or worse than expected mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction patients? Improved risk adjustment with present-at-admission diagnoses.
Stukenborg GJ; Wagner DP; Harrell FE; Oliver MN; Heim SW; Price AL; Han CK; Wolf AM; Connors AF
Circulation; 2007 Dec; 116(25):2960-8. PubMed ID: 18071076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Present-at-admission diagnoses improved mortality risk adjustment among acute myocardial infarction patients.
Stukenborg GJ; Wagner DP; Harrell FE; Oliver MN; Heim SW; Price AL; Han CK; Wolf AM; Connors AF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 60(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 17208120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital mortality risk adjustment for heart failure patients using present on admission diagnoses: improved classification and calibration.
Stukenborg GJ
Med Care; 2011 Aug; 49(8):744-51. PubMed ID: 21577166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Letter by Gale et al regarding article, "which hospitals have significantly better or worse than expected mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction patients? Improved risk adjustment with present-at-admission diagnoses".
Gale CP; Birkhead JS; Manda SO
Circulation; 2008 Jul; 118(1):e9; author reply e10. PubMed ID: 18591446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of fixed- and random-effects models for classifying hospitals as mortality outliers: a Monte Carlo assessment.
Austin PC; Alter DA; Tu JV
Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(6):526-39. PubMed ID: 14672113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk adjustment in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: a comparison of logistic versus hierarchical modeling.
Cohen ME; Dimick JB; Bilimoria KY; Ko CY; Richards K; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Dec; 209(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 19959035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital discharge abstract data on comorbidity improved the prediction of death among patients hospitalized with aspiration pneumonia.
Stukenborg GJ; Wagner DP; Harrell FE; Oliver MN; Kilbridge KL; Lyman J; Einbinder J; Connors AF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):522-32. PubMed ID: 15196623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool?
Romano PS; Chan BK
Health Serv Res; 2000 Mar; 34(7):1469-89. PubMed ID: 10737448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the choice of benchmark on the conclusions of hospital report cards.
Austin PC; Alter DA; Anderson GM; Tu JV
Am Heart J; 2004 Dec; 148(6):1041-6. PubMed ID: 15632891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California.
Parker JP; Li Z; Damberg CL; Danielsen B; Carlisle DM
Med Care; 2006 Jul; 44(7):687-95. PubMed ID: 16799364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.
Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.
Shahian DM; Normand SL
Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(15):1955-63. PubMed ID: 18391106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure outcomes at specialty cardiac hospitals.
Nallamothu BK; Wang Y; Cram P; Birkmeyer JD; Ross JS; Normand SL; Krumholz HM
Circulation; 2007 Nov; 116(20):2280-7. PubMed ID: 17967975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Appending limited clinical data to an administrative database for assessing institutional quality outliers for AMI care: does it matter?
Weller WE; Kabra G; Cozzens KS; Hannan EL
Int J Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 140(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 19038463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data.
Weiss ES; Chang DD; Joyce DL; Nwakanma LU; Yuh DD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):503-11, 511.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18329460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of changing the statistical methodology on hospital and surgeon ranking: the case of the New York State cardiac surgery report card.
Glance LG; Dick A; Osler TM; Li Y; Mukamel DB
Med Care; 2006 Apr; 44(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 16565631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modifying ICD-9-CM coding of secondary diagnoses to improve risk-adjustment of inpatient mortality rates.
Pine M; Jordan HS; Elixhauser A; Fry DE; Hoaglin DC; Jones B; Meimban R; Warner D; Gonzales J
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 18812585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between an empirically derived model and the EuroSCORE system in the evaluation of hospital performance: the example of the Italian CABG Outcome Project.
D'Errigo P; Seccareccia F; Rosato S; Manno V; Badoni G; Fusco D; Perucci CA;
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Mar; 33(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 18201891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and testing of a systemic lupus-specific risk adjustment index for in-hospital mortality.
Ward MM
J Rheumatol; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1408-13. PubMed ID: 10852262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in presenting characteristics and hospital mortality among patients with ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006.
Rogers WJ; Frederick PD; Stoehr E; Canto JG; Ornato JP; Gibson CM; Pollack CV; Gore JM; Chandra-Strobos N; Peterson ED; French WJ
Am Heart J; 2008 Dec; 156(6):1026-34. PubMed ID: 19032996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
