BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18072482)

  • 1. A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms.
    Yuan Y; Giger ML; Li H; Suzuki K; Sennett C
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4180-93. PubMed ID: 18072482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms.
    Kupinski MA; Giger ML
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):510-7. PubMed ID: 9845307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
    Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study of mass segmentation algorithm for digital mammograms].
    Chen L; Zhang K; Jin Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1282-4. PubMed ID: 19166192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast mass segmentation in mammography using plane fitting and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Jiang L; Jin R; Zhang L; Yuan Y; Li Q
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 19362024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Steepest changes of a probability-based cost function for delineation of mammographic masses: a validation study.
    Kinnard L; Lo SC; Makariou E; Osicka T; Wang P; Chouikha MF; Freedman MT
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2796-810. PubMed ID: 15543787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography.
    Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):958-71. PubMed ID: 15191279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dependence of Shape-Based Descriptors and Mass Segmentation Areas on Initial Contour Placement Using the Chan-Vese Method on Digital Mammograms.
    Acho SN; Rae WI
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():349874. PubMed ID: 26379762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms.
    Berber T; Alpkocak A; Balci P; Dicle O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23273502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
    Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16399033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Segmentation of suspicious densities in digital mammograms.
    te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 11243351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmentation of mammography by applying GrowCut for mass detection.
    Cordeiro FR; Santos WP; Silva-Filhoa AG
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():87-91. PubMed ID: 23920521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
    Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.
    Li H; Giger ML; Yuan Y; Chen W; Horsch K; Lan L; Jamieson AR; Sennett CA; Jansen SA
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45. PubMed ID: 18995194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
    Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
    Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.