40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18072490)
1. Automated breast segmentation of fat and water MR images using dynamic programming.
Rosado-Toro JA; Barr T; Galons JP; Marron MT; Stopeck A; Thomson C; Thompson P; Carroll D; Wolf E; Altbach MI; Rodríguez JJ
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 25572926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dependence of Shape-Based Descriptors and Mass Segmentation Areas on Initial Contour Placement Using the Chan-Vese Method on Digital Mammograms.
Acho SN; Rae WI
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():349874. PubMed ID: 26379762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic Segmentation of MRI Images in Dynamic Programming Mode.
Marusina MY; Karaseva EA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Oct; 19(10):2771-2775. PubMed ID: 30360605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-threshold Image Segmentation based on an improved Salp Swarm Algorithm: Case study of breast cancer pathology images.
Guo H; Li M; Liu H; Chen X; Cheng Z; Li X; Yu H; He Q
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jan; 168():107769. PubMed ID: 38039898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring Multiple-Objective Optimization for Efficient and Effective Test Paper Design with Dynamic Programming Guided Genetic Algorithm.
Wang H; Zhuge Q; Sha EH; Xia J; Xu R
Math Biosci Eng; 2024 Feb; 21(3):3668-3694. PubMed ID: 38549301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole mammographic mass segmentation using attention mechanism and multiscale pooling adversarial network.
Wang Y; Wang S; Chen J; Wu C
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 Sep; 7(5):054503. PubMed ID: 33102621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional expansion of a dynamic programming method for boundary detection and its application to sequential magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Cheng DC; Lin JT
Sensors (Basel); 2012; 12(5):5195-211. PubMed ID: 22778580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discovery of 2-(2-benzoxazoyl amino)-4-aryl-5-cyanopyrimidine as negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu₅): from an artificial neural network virtual screen to an in vivo tool compound.
Mueller R; Dawson ES; Meiler J; Rodriguez AL; Chauder BA; Bates BS; Felts AS; Lamb JP; Menon UN; Jadhav SB; Kane AS; Jones CK; Gregory KJ; Niswender CM; Conn PJ; Olsen CM; Winder DG; Emmitte KA; Lindsley CW
ChemMedChem; 2012 Mar; 7(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 22267125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of cancerous masses in mammograms by template matching: optimization of template brightness distribution by means of evolutionary algorithm.
Bator M; Nieniewski M
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 21748410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image analysis in medical imaging: recent advances in selected examples.
Dougherty G
Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2010; 6(3):e32. PubMed ID: 21611048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic detection of the carotid artery boundary on cross-sectional MR image sequences using a circle model guided dynamic programming.
Cheng DC; Billich C; Liu SH; Brunner H; Qiu YC; Shen YL; Brambs HJ; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Schütz UH
Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Apr; 10():26. PubMed ID: 21477378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marker-controlled watershed for lesion segmentation in mammograms.
Xu S; Liu H; Song E
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):754-63. PubMed ID: 21327973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multilevel learning-based segmentation of ill-defined and spiculated masses in mammograms.
Tao Y; Lo SC; Freedman MT; Makariou E; Xuan J
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5993-6002. PubMed ID: 21158311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Mammography Using Content-based Image Retrieval Approaches: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Zheng B
Algorithms; 2009 Jun; 2(2):828-849. PubMed ID: 20305801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Malignant lesion segmentation in contrast-enhanced breast MR images based on the marker-controlled watershed.
Cui Y; Tan Y; Zhao B; Liberman L; Parbhu R; Kaplan J; Theodoulou M; Hudis C; Schwartz LH
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4359-69. PubMed ID: 19928066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers.
Mu T; Nandi AK; Rangayyan RM
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):153-69. PubMed ID: 18306000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved dynamic-programming-based algorithms for segmentation of masses in mammograms.
Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4256-69. PubMed ID: 18072490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast mass segmentation in mammography using plane fitting and dynamic programming.
Song E; Jiang L; Jin R; Zhang L; Yuan Y; Li Q
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 19362024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
