214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18072499)
21. The incidence of inclusion of the sigmoid colon and small bowel in the planning target volume in radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
De Meerleer GO; Villeirs GM; Vakaet L; Delrue LJ; De Neve WJ
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Sep; 180(9):573-81. PubMed ID: 15378188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Patient positioning using in-room kV CT for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of prostate cancer].
Kliton J; Agoston P; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2012 Sep; 56(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 23008828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Coverage-based treatment planning: optimizing the IMRT PTV to meet a CTV coverage criterion.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):961-73. PubMed ID: 19378757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy.
Su FC; Shi C; Crownover R; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Aug; 7(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 18642967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modelling the variation in rectal dose due to inter-fraction rectal wall deformation in external beam prostate treatments.
Booth J; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5055-74. PubMed ID: 16237241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric implications of residual seminal vesicle motion in fiducial-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Stenmark MH; Vineberg K; Ten Haken RK; Hamstra DA; Feng M
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 22189029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dose calculations accounting for breathing motion in stereotactic lung radiotherapy based on 4D-CT and the internal target volume.
Admiraal MA; Schuring D; Hurkmans CW
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18082905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dosimetric impact of image-guided 3D conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
Schaly B; Bauman GS; Song W; Battista JJ; Van Dyk J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3083-101. PubMed ID: 15972982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetric evaluation of daily rigid and nonrigid geometric correction strategies during on-line image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate cancer.
Song WY; Wong E; Bauman GS; Battista JJ; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):352-65. PubMed ID: 17278521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of margins, integral dose and interfraction target coverage with image-guided radiotherapy compared with non-image-guided radiotherapy for bladder cancer.
Foroudi F; Pham D; Bressel M; Hardcastle N; Gill S; Kron T
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2014 Aug; 26(8):497-505. PubMed ID: 24726459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Changes in target volumes definition by using MRI for prostate bed radiotherapy planning--preliminary results].
Sefrová J; Paluska ; Odrázka K; Belobradek Z; Hoffmann P; Prosvic P; Brod'ák M; Louda M; Macingová Z; Vosmik M
Klin Onkol; 2010; 23(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 20806824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Treatment simulations with a statistical deformable motion model to evaluate margins for multiple targets in radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Thörnqvist S; Hysing LB; Zolnay AG; Söhn M; Hoogeman MS; Muren LP; Bentzen L; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Dec; 109(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 24183863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vector analysis of prostate patient setup with image-guided radiation therapy via kV cone beam computed tomography.
Perks J; Turnbull H; Liu T; Purdy J; Valicenti R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Mar; 79(3):915-9. PubMed ID: 20643510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of dose compensation in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Wu Q; Liang J; Yan D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1405-19. PubMed ID: 16510952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetric effects of positioning shifts using 6D-frameless stereotactic Brainlab system in hypofractionated intracranial radiotherapy.
Jin H; Keeling VP; Ali I; Ahmad S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):102-111. PubMed ID: 26894336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigation of interfractional shape variations based on statistical point distribution model for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Shibayama Y; Arimura H; Hirose TA; Nakamoto T; Sasaki T; Ohga S; Matsushita N; Umezu Y; Nakamura Y; Honda H
Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1837-1845. PubMed ID: 28295382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
