These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18072965)
1. Exploring dependence between categorical variables: Benefits and limitations of using variable selection within Bayesian clustering in relation to log-linear modelling with interaction terms. Papathomas M; Richardson S J Stat Plan Inference; 2016 Jun; 173():47-63. PubMed ID: 27330244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Likelihood Ratio Test and the Evidential Approach for 2 × 2 Tables. Cahusac PMB Entropy (Basel); 2024 Apr; 26(5):. PubMed ID: 38785625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. TENSOR DECOMPOSITIONS AND SPARSE LOG-LINEAR MODELS. Johndrow JE; Bhattacharya A; Dunson DB Ann Stat; 2017; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 29332971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining test statistics and models in bootstrapped model rejection: it is a balancing act. Johansson R; Strålfors P; Cedersund G BMC Syst Biol; 2014 Apr; 8():46. PubMed ID: 24742065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical challenges of high-dimensional data. Johnstone IM; Titterington DM Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2009 Nov; 367(1906):4237-53. PubMed ID: 19805443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model Fit after Pairwise Maximum Likelihood. Barendse MT; Ligtvoet R; Timmerman ME; Oort FJ Front Psychol; 2016; 7():528. PubMed ID: 27148136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elucidating the foundations of statistical inference with 2 x 2 tables. Choi L; Blume JD; Dupont WD PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121263. PubMed ID: 25849515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Element from the periodic table's far reaches coaxed into elusive compound. Peplow M Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8015):20. PubMed ID: 38778200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical Methods and Software for Substance Use and Dependence Genetic Research. Lan T; Yang B; Zhang X; Wang T; Lu Q Curr Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(3):172-183. PubMed ID: 31929725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian modeling of temporal dependence in large sparse contingency tables. Kunihama T; Dunson DB J Am Stat Assoc; 2013 Jan; 108(504):1324-1338. PubMed ID: 24482548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sparse linear modeling of next-generation mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data for isoform discovery and abundance estimation. Li JJ; Jiang CR; Brown JB; Huang H; Bickel PJ Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Dec; 108(50):19867-72. PubMed ID: 22135461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Penalized likelihood for sparse contingency tables with an application to full-length cDNA libraries. Dahinden C; Parmigiani G; Emerick MC; Bühlmann P BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 8():476. PubMed ID: 18072965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental design for efficient identification of gene regulatory networks using sparse Bayesian models. Steinke F; Seeger M; Tsuda K BMC Syst Biol; 2007 Nov; 1():51. PubMed ID: 18021391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximum Augmented Empirical Likelihood Estimation of Categorical Marginal Models for Large Sparse Contingency Tables. van der Ark LA; Bergsma WP; Koopman L Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1228-1248. PubMed ID: 37752345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decomposition and model selection for large contingency tables. Dahinden C; Kalisch M; Bühlmann P Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):233-52. PubMed ID: 20213739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Logistic regression by means of evolutionary radial basis function neural networks. Gutierrez PA; Hervas-Martinez C; Martinez-Estudillo FJ IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2011 Feb; 22(2):246-63. PubMed ID: 21138802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model selection in systems and synthetic biology. Kirk P; Thorne T; Stumpf MP Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2013 Aug; 24(4):767-74. PubMed ID: 23578462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]