These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Redies C Spat Vis; 2007; 21(1-2):97-117. PubMed ID: 18073053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artists portray human faces with the Fourier statistics of complex natural scenes. Redies C; Hänisch J; Blickhan M; Denzler J Network; 2007 Sep; 18(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 17852751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities. Graham DJ; Field DJ Spat Vis; 2007; 21(1-2):149-64. PubMed ID: 18073056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual and physiological responses to the visual complexity of fractal patterns. Taylor RP; Spehar B; Wise JA; Clifford CW; Newell BR; Hagerhall CM; Purcell T; Martin TP Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2005 Jan; 9(1):89-114. PubMed ID: 15629069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1/f 2 Characteristics and isotropy in the fourier power spectra of visual art, cartoons, comics, mangas, and different categories of photographs. Koch M; Denzler J; Redies C PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e12268. PubMed ID: 20808863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical regularities in art: Relations with visual coding and perception. Graham DJ; Redies C Vision Res; 2010 Jul; 50(16):1503-9. PubMed ID: 20580643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual coding and the phase structure of natural scenes. Thomson MG Network; 1999 May; 10(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 10378188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artistic representations: clues to efficient coding in human vision. Graham DJ; Meng M Vis Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 28(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 21838937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How do painters represent motion in garments? Graphic invariants across centuries. Gori S; Pedersini R; Giora E Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):201-27. PubMed ID: 18534100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The tuning of human visual cortex to variations in the 1/f Isherwood ZJ; Schira MM; Spehar B Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():642-657. PubMed ID: 27742601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity in art. Forsythe A; Nadal M; Sheehy N; Cela-Conde CJ; Sawey M Br J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 102(1):49-70. PubMed ID: 21241285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual anisotropies in visual processing and their relation to natural image statistics. Hansen BC; Essock EA; Zheng Y; DeFord JK Network; 2003 Aug; 14(3):501-26. PubMed ID: 12938769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How many pixels make an image? Torralba A Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 19216820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial scene representations formed by self-organizing learning in a hippocampal extension of the ventral visual system. Rolls ET; Tromans JM; Stringer SM Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 28(10):2116-27. PubMed ID: 19046392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image/source statistics of surfaces in natural scenes. Yang Z; Purves D Network; 2003 Aug; 14(3):371-90. PubMed ID: 12938763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional vs computational complexity measures in observing paintings. Cardaci M; Di Gesù V; Petrou M; Tabacchi ME Spat Vis; 2009; 22(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 19460272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Independence of color and luminance edges in natural scenes. Hansen T; Gegenfurtner KR Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 19152717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]