475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18073281)
1. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in connectedness over time in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Nieuwhof GJ; Lewis RM
J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 18073292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of sire mating patterns on future genetic merit and inbreeding in a closed beef cattle population.
Oyama K; Nojima M; Shojo M; Fukushima M; Anada K; Mukai F
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Apr; 124(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 17488357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Connectedness in Targhee and Suffolk flocks participating in the United States National Sheep Improvement Program.
Kuehn LA; Lewis RM; Notter DR
J Anim Sci; 2009 Feb; 87(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 18849390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive performance and genetic parameters in first cross ewes from different maternal genotypes.
Afolayan RA; Fogarty NM; Gilmour AR; Ingham VM; Gaunt GM; Cummins LJ
J Anim Sci; 2008 Apr; 86(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 18156352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of breeding intensity on above- and below-average sexual performance rams in single- and multiple-sire breeding environments.
Stellflug JN; Cockett NE; Lewis GS
Anim Reprod Sci; 2008 Mar; 104(2-4):248-56. PubMed ID: 17383123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sheep breeding schemes utilising artificial insemination; large-scale simulation with a complex breeding goal.
Eikje LS; Schaeffer LR; Adnøy T; Klemetsdal G
Animal; 2011 Mar; 5(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 22445403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strong connectedness within Norwegian Cheviot and Fur Sheep ram circles allows reliable estimation of breeding values.
Eikje LS; Lewis RM
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3322-30. PubMed ID: 26440001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the efficiency of alternative two-tier nucleus breeding systems designed to improve meat sheep in Kenya.
Gicheha MG; Kosgey IS; Bebe BO; Kahi AK
J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 16882091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Manipulation of reproduction in sheep.
Haresign W
J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1992; 45():127-39. PubMed ID: 1304027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of dairy bull fertility from field data: use of multiple services and identification and utilization of factors affecting bull fertility.
Kuhn MT; Hutchison JL
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jun; 91(6):2481-92. PubMed ID: 18487672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ram mating behavior after long-term selection for reproductive rate in Rambouillet ewes.
Stellflug JN; Berardinelli JG
J Anim Sci; 2002 Oct; 80(10):2588-93. PubMed ID: 12413080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
