These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1807396)
21. A clinical review of the adult hip guidance orthosis (Para Walker) in traumatic paraplegics. Summers BN; McClelland MR; el Masri WS Paraplegia; 1988 Feb; 26(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 3353122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The efficiency of walking of paraplegic patients using a reciprocating gait orthosis. Bernardi M; Canale I; Castellano V; Di Filippo L; Felici F; Marchetti M Paraplegia; 1995 Jul; 33(7):409-15. PubMed ID: 7478731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the performance of paraplegic subjects during walking with a new design of reciprocal gait orthosis. Karimi MT; Fatoye F Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 25069902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Restoration of gait with orthoses in thoracic paraplegia: a multicentric investigation. Lotta S; Fiocchi A; Giovannini R; Silvestrin R; Tesio L; Raschi A; Macchia L; Chiapatti V; Zambelli M; Tosi C Paraplegia; 1994 Sep; 32(9):608-15. PubMed ID: 7997340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Functional ambulation in myelodysplasia: the effect of orthotic selection on physical and physiologic performance. Flandry F; Burke S; Roberts JM; Hall S; Drouilhet A; Davis G; Cook S J Pediatr Orthop; 1986; 6(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 3793886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Physiologic costs of reciprocal gait in FES assisted walking. Winchester P; Carollo JJ; Habasevich R Paraplegia; 1994 Oct; 32(10):680-6. PubMed ID: 7831075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reciprocating orthoses for children with myelomeningocele. A comparison of two types. Phillips DL; Field RE; Broughton NS; Menelaus MB J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Jan; 77(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 7822365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Energy expenditure and fatiguability in paraplegic ambulation using reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation. Hirokawa S; Solomonow M; Baratta R; D'Ambrosia R Disabil Rehabil; 1996 Mar; 18(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 8695882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Energy costs of walking and standing with functional neuromuscular stimulation and long leg braces. Marsolais EB; Edwards BG Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Apr; 69(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 3258509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ankle-foot orthoses: effect on energy expenditure of gait in spastic diplegic children. Mossberg KA; Linton KA; Friske K Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Jun; 71(7):490-4. PubMed ID: 2350218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Energy expenditure during gait using the walkabout and isocentric reciprocal gait orthoses in persons with paraplegia. Harvey LA; Davis GM; Smith MB; Engel S Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 79(8):945-9. PubMed ID: 9710167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of the reciprocal cable linkage in the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis on paraplegic gait performance. IJzerman MJ; Baardman G; Hermens HJ; Veltink PH; Boom HB; Zilvold G Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Apr; 21(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 9141126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pneumatic orthosis for paraplegic patients: functional evaluation and prescription considerations. Ragnarsson KT; Sell GH; McGarrity M; Ofir R Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1975 Nov; 56(11):479-83. PubMed ID: 1200817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Energy expenditure during walking with weight-bearing control (WBC) orthosis in thoracic level of paraplegic patients. Kawashima N; Sone Y; Nakazawa K; Akai M; Yano H Spinal Cord; 2003 Sep; 41(9):506-10. PubMed ID: 12934091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effectiveness of an innovative hip energy storage walking orthosis for improving paraplegic walking: A pilot randomized controlled study. Yang M; Li J; Guan X; Gao L; Gao F; Du L; Zhao H; Yang D; Yu Y; Wang Q; Wang R; Ji L Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():91-96. PubMed ID: 28578140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative trial of two walking systems for paralysed people. Whittle MW; Cochrane GM; Chase AP; Copping AV; Jefferson RJ; Staples DJ; Fenn PT; Thomas DC Paraplegia; 1991 Feb; 29(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 2023783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Energy consumption in children with myelomeningocele: a comparison between reciprocating gait orthosis and hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis ambulators. Cuddeford TJ; Freeling RP; Thomas SS; Aiona MD; Rex D; Sirolli H; Elliott J; Magnusson M Dev Med Child Neurol; 1997 Apr; 39(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 9183262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Energy cost of ambulation with different methods of foot and ankle immobilization. Fowler PT; Botte MJ; Mathewson JW; Speth SR; Byrne TP; Sutherland DH J Orthop Res; 1993 May; 11(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 8326448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]