These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1807418)

  • 1. Estimation of angulation of Brånemark titanium fixtures from radiographic thread images.
    Sewerin IP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 1807418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants.
    Sewerin IP
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Oct; 98(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 2293349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic image characteristics of Brånemark titanium fixtures.
    Sewerin I
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 1579887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of radiographic image characteristics of Brånemark and IMZ implants.
    Sewerin IP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 1843469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter- and intraobserver variability in radiographic bone level assessment at Brånemark fixtures.
    Gröndahl K; Sundén S; Gröndahl HG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Aug; 9(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 9760899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiographic control of fixture-abutment connection in Brånemark implant technique.
    Sewerin IP
    Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Dec; 97(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 2694329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implants.
    Sundén S; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Dec; 6(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 8603113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
    Pikner SS
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the validity of radiographic measurements of marginal bone height changes around osseointegrated implants.
    Benn DK
    Implant Dent; 1992; 1(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 1288800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting a partial bridge. An up to 6-years retrospective study.
    Quirynen M; Naert I; van Steenberghe D; Dekeyser C; Callens A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Feb; 19(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 1602036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of peri-implant radiolucencies--an in vitro experiment.
    Sewerin IP; Gotfredsen K; Stoltze K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Aug; 8(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 9586477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting an overdenture. A 4-year retrospective study.
    Quirynen M; Naert I; van Steenberghe D; Teerlinck J; Dekeyser C; Theuniers G
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 18(10):719-28. PubMed ID: 1752996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Placement of Brånemark implants in the maxillary tuber region: anatomical considerations, surgical technique and long-term results.
    Ridell A; Gröndahl K; Sennerby L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 19126113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of methods to assess marginal bone height around endosseous implants.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 20(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 8473534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra- and inter-examiner agreement when assessing radiographic implant bone levels: Differences related to brightness, accuracy, participant demographics and implant characteristics.
    Walton TR; Layton DM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):756-771. PubMed ID: 30240063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary stability of implants placed at different angulations in artificial bone.
    Kashi A; Gupta B; Malmstrom H; Romanos GE
    Implant Dent; 2015 Feb; 24(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 25379664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
    De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system.
    Quirynen M; Naert I; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Sep; 3(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 1290790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Radiographic Images for Assessing Crestal Bone Height of Implants Using the Precision Implant X-ray Locator (PIXRL) Device.
    Malloy KA; Wadhwani C; McAllister B; Wang M; Katancik JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):830-836. PubMed ID: 28708915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are Intraoral Radiographs Accurate in Determining the Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level?
    Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30025001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.