BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1807419)

  • 1. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone.
    Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 1807419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants.
    Johansson CB; Sennerby L; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1820312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs.
    Gotfredsen K; Nimb L; Hjörting-Hansen E; Jensen JS; Holmén A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Jun; 3(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15900672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching.
    Cho SA; Park KT
    Biomaterials; 2003 Sep; 24(20):3611-7. PubMed ID: 12809791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
    Park JW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
    Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
    Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation.
    Sul YT; Johansson CB; Kang Y; Jeon DG; Albrektsson T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 12121607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of Ca(2+) modifications for osseointegration of smooth and moderately rough anodized titanium implants - a removal torque and histological evaluation in rabbit.
    Fröjd V; Wennerberg A; Franke Stenport V
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):737-45. PubMed ID: 20977616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone.
    Johansson CB; Han CH; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9638001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein.
    Park JM; Koak JY; Jang JH; Han CH; Kim SK; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 17190295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating.
    Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osseointegration evaluation of laser-deposited titanium dioxide nanoparticles on commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Azzawi ZGM; Hamad TI; Kadhim SA; Naji GA
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Jun; 29(7):96. PubMed ID: 29946975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The osseointegration behavior of titanium-zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits.
    Wen B; Zhu F; Li Z; Zhang P; Lin X; Dard M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. PubMed ID: 23432001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of osseointegration on various implant surfaces after bacterial contamination and cleaning: a rabbit study.
    Yuan K; Chan YJ; Kung KC; Lee TM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 24451851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
    Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.