These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18074708)

  • 1. Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance.
    Cummings ML; Kilgore RM; Wang E; Tijerina L; Kochhar DS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1097-106. PubMed ID: 18074708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving.
    Bliss JP; Acton SA
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):499-509. PubMed ID: 14559409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Looming auditory collision warnings for driving.
    Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21469534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of collision warning characteristics on driving behaviors and safety in connected vehicle environments.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Huang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107053. PubMed ID: 37030178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():55-66. PubMed ID: 28189059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory alerts for in-vehicle information systems: the effects of temporal conflict and sound parameters on driver attitudes and performance.
    Wiese EE; Lee JD
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jul; 47(9):965-86. PubMed ID: 15204273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of warning characteristics on driver behavior in connected vehicles systems with missed warnings.
    Zhang Y; Wu C; Qiao C; Hou Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():138-145. PubMed ID: 30639686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of lane departure warnings onset and reliability on car drivers' behaviors.
    Navarro J; Deniel J; Yousfi E; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):123-131. PubMed ID: 27890120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of intelligent advanced warnings on drivers negotiating the dilemma zone.
    Gugerty L; McIntyre SE; Link D; Zimmerman K; Tolani D; Huang P; Pokorny RA
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1021-35. PubMed ID: 25277014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing effectiveness of various auditory warning signals in maintaining drivers' attention in virtual reality-based driving environments.
    Lin CT; Chiu TT; Huang TY; Chao CF; Liang WC; Hsu SH; Ko LW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):825-35. PubMed ID: 19725318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.