These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18075035)

  • 1. Expediting the identification of impaired channels in cochlear implants via analysis of speech-based confusion matrices.
    Remus JJ; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Dec; 54(12):2193-204. PubMed ID: 18075035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.
    Zwolan TA; Collins LM; Wakefield GH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3673-85. PubMed ID: 9407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels.
    Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2908-25. PubMed ID: 17139748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Conception and realisation of a prosody test battery].
    Meister H; Pyschny V; Landwehr M; Wagner P; Walger M; von Wedel H
    HNO; 2008 Mar; 56(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 17579822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation.
    Fu QJ; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 6(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 15952053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C; Fu QJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indication of a relation between speech perception and temporal resolution for cochlear implantees.
    Cazals Y; Pelizzone M; Kasper A; Montandon P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):893-5. PubMed ID: 1746822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills.
    Zwolan TA; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Ashbaugh CJ; Hieber SJ; Kileny PR; Telian SA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 9201459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The contribution of different cochlear insertion region to Mandarin speech perception in users of cochlear implant].
    Qi B; Liu B; Liu S; Liu H; Dong R; Zhang N; Gong S
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 25(10):441-4. PubMed ID: 21809554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults.
    Rousset A; Dowell R; Leigh J
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S24-30. PubMed ID: 27160793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients.
    Pelizzone M; Boëx C; Montandon P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.