These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18075160)

  • 1. A historical perspective of template-based protein structure prediction.
    Guo JT; Ellrott K; Xu Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 413():3-42. PubMed ID: 18075160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CASP and CAFASP experiments and their findings.
    Bourne PE
    Methods Biochem Anal; 2003; 44():501-7. PubMed ID: 12647401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A glance into the evolution of template-free protein structure prediction methodologies.
    Dhingra S; Sowdhamini R; Cadet F; Offmann B
    Biochimie; 2020 Aug; 175():85-92. PubMed ID: 32417458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. eThread: a highly optimized machine learning-based approach to meta-threading and the modeling of protein tertiary structures.
    Brylinski M; Lingam D
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50200. PubMed ID: 23185577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contact-Assisted Threading in Low-Homology Protein Modeling.
    Bhattacharya S; Roche R; Shuvo MH; Moussad B; Bhattacharya D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2627():41-59. PubMed ID: 36959441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TOUCHSTONE: a unified approach to protein structure prediction.
    Skolnick J; Zhang Y; Arakaki AK; Kolinski A; Boniecki M; Szilágyi A; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():469-79. PubMed ID: 14579335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
    Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A "FRankenstein's monster" approach to comparative modeling: merging the finest fragments of Fold-Recognition models and iterative model refinement aided by 3D structure evaluation.
    Kosinski J; Cymerman IA; Feder M; Kurowski MA; Sasin JM; Bujnicki JM
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():369-79. PubMed ID: 14579325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CAFASP-1: critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods.
    Fischer D; Barret C; Bryson K; Elofsson A; Godzik A; Jones D; Karplus KJ; Kelley LA; MacCallum RM; Pawowski K; Rost B; Rychlewski L; Sternberg M
    Proteins; 1999; Suppl 3():209-17. PubMed ID: 10526371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A homology/ab initio hybrid algorithm for sampling near-native protein conformations.
    Dhingra P; Jayaram B
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Aug; 34(22):1925-36. PubMed ID: 23728619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Template based protein structure modeling by global optimization in CASP11.
    Joo K; Joung I; Lee SY; Kim JY; Cheng Q; Manavalan B; Joung JY; Heo S; Lee J; Nam M; Lee IH; Lee SJ; Lee J
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1():221-32. PubMed ID: 26329522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FALCON@home: a high-throughput protein structure prediction server based on remote homologue recognition.
    Wang C; Zhang H; Zheng WM; Xu D; Zhu J; Wang B; Ning K; Sun S; Li SC; Bu D
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(3):462-4. PubMed ID: 26454278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions.
    Kinch LN; Wrabl JO; Krishna SS; Majumdar I; Sadreyev RI; Qi Y; Pei J; Cheng H; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():395-409. PubMed ID: 14579328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server.
    Chivian D; Kim DE; Malmström L; Bradley P; Robertson T; Murphy P; Strauss CE; Bonneau R; Rohl CA; Baker D
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():524-33. PubMed ID: 14579342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein structure prediction using threading.
    Xu J; Jiao F; Yu L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 413():91-121. PubMed ID: 18075163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The utility of artificially evolved sequences in protein threading and fold recognition.
    Brylinski M
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Jul; 328():77-88. PubMed ID: 23542050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmarking of TASSER in the ab initio limit.
    Borreguero JM; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17444524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent advances in sequence-based protein structure prediction.
    Kc DB
    Brief Bioinform; 2017 Nov; 18(6):1021-1032. PubMed ID: 27562963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study.
    Klepeis JL; Wei Y; Hecht MH; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):560-70. PubMed ID: 15609306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein folding: from the levinthal paradox to structure prediction.
    Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Oct; 293(2):283-93. PubMed ID: 10550209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.