82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18075161)
1. The assessment of methods for protein structure prediction.
Tramontano A; Cozzetto D; Giorgetti A; Raimondo D
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 413():43-57. PubMed ID: 18075161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evaluation of protein structure prediction results.
Cozzetto D; Giorgetti A; Raimondo D; Tramontano A
Mol Biotechnol; 2008 May; 39(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18071927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toolbox for Protein Structure Prediction.
Roche DB; McGuffin LJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1369():363-77. PubMed ID: 26519323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advances in Protein Super-Secondary Structure Prediction and Application to Protein Structure Prediction.
MacCarthy E; Perry D; Kc DB
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():15-45. PubMed ID: 30945212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.
Haas J; Barbato A; Behringer D; Studer G; Roth S; Bertoni M; Mostaguir K; Gumienny R; Schwede T
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):387-398. PubMed ID: 29178137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round V.
Moult J; Fidelis K; Zemla A; Hubbard T
Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():334-9. PubMed ID: 14579322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New tools and expanded data analysis capabilities at the Protein Structure Prediction Center.
Kryshtafovych A; Prlic A; Dmytriv Z; Daniluk P; Milostan M; Eyrich V; Hubbard T; Fidelis K
Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8(S8):19-26. PubMed ID: 17705273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small angle X-ray scattering and cross-linking for data assisted protein structure prediction in CASP 12 with prospects for improved accuracy.
Ogorzalek TL; Hura GL; Belsom A; Burnett KH; Kryshtafovych A; Tainer JA; Rappsilber J; Tsutakawa SE; Fidelis K
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):202-214. PubMed ID: 29314274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Worth the effort. An account of the Seventh Meeting of the Worldwide Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction.
Tramontano A
FEBS J; 2007 Apr; 274(7):1651-4. PubMed ID: 17313483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server.
Chivian D; Kim DE; Malmström L; Bradley P; Robertson T; Murphy P; Strauss CE; Bonneau R; Rohl CA; Baker D
Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():524-33. PubMed ID: 14579342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An introduction to protein contact prediction.
Hamilton N; Huber T
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():87-104. PubMed ID: 18712298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Massive integration of diverse protein quality assessment methods to improve template based modeling in CASP11.
Cao R; Bhattacharya D; Adhikari B; Li J; Cheng J
Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):247-59. PubMed ID: 26369671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP7 function prediction category.
López G; Rojas A; Tress M; Valencia A
Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():165-74. PubMed ID: 17654548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7.
Izarzugaza JM; Graña O; Tress ML; Valencia A; Clarke ND
Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():152-8. PubMed ID: 17671976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New prediction categories in CASP15.
Kryshtafovych A; Antczak M; Szachniuk M; Zok T; Kretsch RC; Rangan R; Pham P; Das R; Robin X; Studer G; Durairaj J; Eberhardt J; Sweeney A; Topf M; Schwede T; Fidelis K; Moult J
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1550-1557. PubMed ID: 37306011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment.
Ginalski K; Rychlewski L
Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():410-7. PubMed ID: 14579329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of 3D-Jury, GRDB, and Verify3D in fold recognition.
von Grotthuss M; Pas J; Wyrwicz L; Ginalski K; Rychlewski L
Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():418-23. PubMed ID: 14579330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of data-assisted prediction by inclusion of crosslinking/mass-spectrometry and small angle X-ray scattering data in the 12
Tamò GE; Abriata LA; Fonti G; Dal Peraro M
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():215-227. PubMed ID: 29235142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protein structure prediction: challenging targets for CASP10.
Runthala A
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2012; 30(5):607-15. PubMed ID: 22731875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
