These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18075208)

  • 1. Evaluation of the control banding method--comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment.
    Hashimoto H; Goto T; Nakachi N; Suzuki H; Takebayashi T; Kajiki S; Mori K
    J Occup Health; 2007 Nov; 49(6):482-92. PubMed ID: 18075208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Recent prevention strategies and occupational risk analysis: Control Banding and Sobane].
    Ghittori S; Ferrari M; Negri S; Serranti P; Sacco P; Biffi R; Imbriani M
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2006; 28(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 16705887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Assessment of the Robustness of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) Target Airborne Concentration Ranges 15 Years on, and Their Usefulness for Determining Control Measures.
    Vaughan NP; Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah R
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Apr; 61(3):270-283. PubMed ID: 28355421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occupational exposure limits for chemicals.
    Topping M
    Occup Environ Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 11160994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Strength and Validity of Hazard Banding.
    Scheffers T; Doornaert B; Berne N; van Breukelen G; Leplay A; van Miert E
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Nov; 60(9):1049-1061. PubMed ID: 27621219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. History and evolution of control banding: a review.
    Zalk DM; Nelson DI
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 May; 5(5):330-46. PubMed ID: 18350442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Margins of safety provided by COSHH Essentials and the ILO Chemical Control Toolkit.
    Jones RM; Nicas M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 16172140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Predictive models for the assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals: a new challenge for employers].
    Gromiec JP; Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Jankowska A; Czerczak S
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(5):699-716. PubMed ID: 24502133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapor degreasing and bag filling operations.
    Jones RM; Nicas M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16172141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hazard banding in compliance with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for use in control banding tools.
    Arnone M; Koppisch D; Smola T; Gabriel S; Verbist K; Visser R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Oct; 73(1):287-95. PubMed ID: 26206396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of mental models in chemical risk protection: developing a generic workplace methodology.
    Cox P; Niewöhmer J; Pidgeon N; Gerrard S; Fischhoff B; Riley D
    Risk Anal; 2003 Apr; 23(2):311-24. PubMed ID: 12731816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.
    Schenk L
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 33(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 32699425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemical exposure and risk assessment at workplaces--modeling approach.
    Mäkinen M; Hämäläinen M; Forsman K; Liesivuori J
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Nov; 17(11):744-9. PubMed ID: 12419101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A structured strategy for assessing chemical risks, suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises.
    Balsat A; de Graeve J; Mairiaux P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Oct; 47(7):549-56. PubMed ID: 14530181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
    Phillips JA; Holland MG; Baldwin DD; Gifford-Meuleveld L; Mueller KL; Perkison B; Upfal M; Dreger M
    Workplace Health Saf; 2015 Apr; 63(4):139-64. PubMed ID: 25862727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expert judgment and occupational hygiene: application to aerosol speciation in the nickel primary production industry.
    Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Vincent JH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Aug; 47(6):461-75. PubMed ID: 12890655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk management measures for chemicals: the "COSHH essentials" approach.
    Garrod AN; Evans PG; Davy CW
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S48-54. PubMed ID: 17565355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the HSE COSHH Essentials exposure predictive model on the basis of BAuA field studies and existing substances exposure data.
    Tischer M; Bredendiek-Kämper S; Poppek U
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Oct; 47(7):557-69. PubMed ID: 14530182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Control banding assessment of workers' exposure to indium and its compounds in 13 Japanese indium plants.
    Higashikubo I; Arito H; Ando K; Araki A; Shimizu H; Sakurai H
    J Occup Health; 2018 May; 60(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 29563364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An introduction to a UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals.
    Russell RM; Maidment SC; Brooke I; Topping MD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1998 Aug; 42(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 9738434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.